NEWS,08.12.2012

US 'fiscal cliff' fear may push investors to sell

Investors typically sell stocks to cut their losses at year end. But worries about the 'fiscal cliff' and the possibility of higher taxes in 2013 - may act as the greatest incentive to sell both winners and losers by December 31.The $US600 billion of automatic tax increases and spending cuts scheduled for the beginning of next year includes higher rates for capital gains, making tax-loss selling even more appealing than usual.Tax-related selling may be behind the weaker trend in the shares of market leader Apple, analysts said. The stock is down 20% for the quarter, but it's still up nearly 32% for the year.Apple dropped 8.9% in this past week alone. For a stock that gained more than 25% a year for four consecutive years, the embedded capital gains suddenly look like a selling opportunity if one's tax bill is going to jump sharply just because the calendar changes."Tax-loss selling is always a factor but  tax-gains selling has been a factor this year," said Paul Mendelsohn, chief investment strategist at Windham Financial Services in Charlotte, Vermont."You have a lot of high-net-worth individuals in taxable accounts, and that could be what's affecting stocks like Apple. If you look at the stocks that people have their largest gains in, they seem to be under a little bit more pressure here than usual."Of this year's top 20 performers in the S&P 1500 index, which includes large, small and mid-cap stocks, all but four have lost ground in the last five trading sessions.The rush to avoid higher taxes on portfolio gains could cause additional weakness.The S&P 500 ended the week up just 0.1% after another week of trading largely tied to fiscal cliff negotiation news, which has pushed the market in both directions.Next week's Federal Reserve meeting could offer some relief if policymakers announce further plans to help the lackluster US economy. The Federal Open Market Committee will meet on Wednesday and Thursday.The policy statement is expected on Thursday after the conclusion of the meeting - the Fed's last one for the year.The jobs report showing non-farm payrolls added 146,000 jobs in November eased worries that Superstorm Sandy had hit the labor market hard."After the FOMC meeting, I think it's going to be downhill from there as worries about the fiscal cliff really take center stage and prospects of a deal become less and less likely," said Mohannad Aama, managing director of Beam Capital Management LLC in New York."I think we are likely to see an escalation in profit-taking ahead of tax rates going up next year," he said.Volume could increase as investors try to shift positions before year end, some analysts said.While most of that would be in stocks, some of the extra trading volume could spill over into options, said J.J. Kinahan, TD Ameritrade's chief derivatives strategist.Volatility could pick up as well, and some of that is already being seen in Apple's stock."The actual volatility in Apple has been very high while the market itself has been calm. I expect Apple's volatility to carry over into the market volatility," said Enis Taner, global macro editor at RiskReversal.com, an options trading firm in New York.Shares of Apple, the largest US company by market value, registered their worst week since May 2010. In another bearish sign, the stock's 50-day moving average fell to $US599.52 - below its 200-day moving average at $US601.38."There's a lot of tax-related selling happening now, and it will continue to happen. Apple is an example, even (though) there are other factors involved with Apple," Aama said.While investors may be selling stocks to avoid higher taxes in 2013, companies may continue to announce special and accelerated dividend payments before year end.To be sure, the big sell-off in stocks following the November 6 election was likely related to tax selling, making it hard to judge how much more is to come.Bruce Zaro, chief technical strategist at Delta Global Asset Management in Boston, said there's a decent chance that the market could rally before year end."Even with little or spotty news that one would put in the positive bucket regarding the cliff negotiations, the market has basically hung in there, and I think it's hung in there in anticipation of something coming," he said.

Jobless Benefits Should Be Included In Fiscal Cliff Deal, Democrats Say

 

Hovering in the background of the "fiscal cliff" debate is the prospect of 2 million people losing their unemployment benefits four days after Christmas."This is the real cliff," said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I. He's been leading the effort to include another extension of benefits for the long-term unemployed in any deal to avert looming tax increases and massive spending cuts in January."Many of these people are struggling to pay mortgages, to provide education for their children," Reed said this past week as President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, rejected each other's opening offers for a deficit deal.Emergency jobless benefits for about 2.1 million people out of work more than six months will cease Dec. 29, and 1 million more will lose them over the next three months if Congress doesn't extend the assistance again.Since the collapse of the economy in 2008, the government has poured $520 billion an amount equal to about half its annual deficit in recent years into unemployment benefit extensions.White House officials have assured Democrats that Obama is committed to extending them another year, at a cost of about $30 billion, as part of an agreement for sidestepping the fiscal cliff and reducing the size of annual increases in the federal debt."The White House has made it clear that it wants an extension," said Michigan Rep. Sander Levin, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee.Republicans have been relatively quiet on the issue lately. They demanded and won savings elsewhere to offset the cost of this year's extension, requiring the government to sell some of its broadcasting airwaves and making newly hired federal workers contribute more toward their pensions.Boehner did not include jobless benefits in his counteroffer response this past week to Obama's call for $1.6 trillion in new taxes over the next decade, including raising the top marginal rates for the highest-paid 2 percent.Long-term unemployment remains a persistent problem. About 5 million people have been out of work for six months or more, according to the Bureau of labor Statistics. That's about 40 percent of all unemployed workers.The Labor Department said Friday that the unemployment rate fell to 7.7 percent from 7.9 percent, the lowest in nearly four years. But much of the decline was due to people so discouraged about finding a job that they quit looking for one.Democrats have tried to keep a flame burning under the issue. Ending the extended benefits would "deal a devastating blow to our economy," 42 Democratic senators wrote Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., this past week.The Congressional Budget Office said in a study last month that extending the current level of long-term unemployment benefits another year would add 300,000 jobs to the economy. The average benefit of about $300 a week tends to get spent quickly for food, rent and other basic necessities, the report said, stimulating the economy.The liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute found that extended unemployment benefits lifted 2.3 million Americans out of poverty last year, including 600,000 children.States provide the first 20 weeks to 26 weeks of unemployment benefits for eligible workers who are seeking jobs. When those are exhausted, federal benefits kick in for up to 47 more weeks, depending on the state's unemployment rate.The higher a state's unemployment rate, the longer state residents can qualify for additional weeks of federal unemployment benefits. Only seven states with jobless rates of 9 percent or more now qualify for all 47 weeks.Congress already cut back federal jobless benefits this year. Taken together with what states offer, the benefits could last up to 99 weeks. Cutting the maximum to 73 weeks has already cut off benefits to about 500,000 people.Opponents of benefit extensions argue that they can be a disincentive for taking a job."Prolonged benefits lead some unemployed workers to spend too much time looking for jobs that they would prefer to find, rather than focusing on jobs that they are more likely to find," said James Sherk, a labor policy analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation.But Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, noted that unemployment checks add up to about $15,000 a year. "That's poverty level," he said. "This is not something people just want to continue on, they want to get jobs."

Berlusconi in comeback bid

Billionaire media baron Silvio Berlusconi, who resigned in disgrace with Italy tottering through the European debt crisis, announced on Saturday he was making a comeback and running for a fourth term as premier.Berlusconi, 76, reluctantly stepped down last year after pressure from international financial markets. He was later convicted of tax fraud and is on trial in Milan for alleged sexual misconduct and abuse of power when he was premier.An unelected government of technocrats, led by widely respected economist Mario Monti, was appointed to replace him. Opinion polls have seen the popularity of Berlusconi's Freedom People Party plunge to far below that of Italy's other large political force, the center-left Democratic Party.But Berlusconi professed confidence he can achieve victory."I'm running to win," Berlusconi told reporters outside the training facilities of his soccer team AC Milan.One of Monti's biggest backers in Parliament, centrist leader Pier Ferdinando Casini, bemoaned Berlusconi's bid to return to office."It has been a year that Italians are seriously sacrificing to try to avoid Greece's abyss, and, today, there's the re-emergence of Berlusconi, who wants to bring us back five years," Casini said on state TV.Since Monti took office, the retirement age for Italy's generous pensions has been raised, sales taxes have been hiked and a property tax on primary residences abolished by Berlusconi to fulfill one of his own campaign promises - has been reinstated.But while opinion polls of prospective voters find slumping support for Berlusconi's party, to lower than 15%, the media mogul might be betting on public impatience with those sacrifices.No date has been set for elections, linked to the end of Parliament's term in late April. But Berlusconi's decision earlier in the week to withdraw the support of his party Parliament's largest for Monti's anti-crisis government increased the likelihood that Italy's president would dissolve the legislature weeks early and elections ahead of schedule."It seems to me that 10 March has been indicated" as a possible date for early elections, "and that seems a date that's fine with me," Berlusconi said.Monti headed back from a conference in France for a meeting on Saturday evening at the presidential palace to take the pulse of political tensions. President Giorgio Napolitano has made clear he wants Parliament to at least pass a vital budget law later this month and avoid a "precipitous" demise amid mounting political uncertainty.When pressure from international financial markets forced Berlusconi to reluctantly step down in November 2011 at the height of sovereign debt worries, many pundits dismissed any prospects for a comeback bid for the combative businessman-turned-politician, who has led Italy's conservatives for nearly 20 years.Since Berlusconi resigned 18 months short of the end of his third stint in the premiership, he has been convicted of tax fraud. He is appealing, and in Italy, convictions don't become definitive until after two levels of appeals are exhausted.He is also on trial in Milan for allegedly having sex with an underage prostitute and using his office when premier to try to cover it up, charges he has denied. The young woman has also denied having sex with the then-premier. Berlusconi, whose convictions in previous trials on charges linked to his media empire's dealings have either been overturned or thrown out when statute of limitations expired, claims he is the victim of prosecutors he contends sympathize with the left.With financial markets rattled over the prospect that Monti might see his tenure in the premiership end before May if early elections are called, the premier insisted that the political crisis was "manageable." Monti contended his government, with its austerity agenda of spending cuts, higher taxes and pension reform, spared Italy and with it, other nations in the eurozone from succumbing to financial disaster.Standard & Poor's rating agency on Friday indicated it could lower Italy's rating if the recession endures well into 2013, and it cited "uncertainty" the next Italian government can stay the tough course of austerity Monti's nonpartisan government managed to move through Parliament, thanks to the wide support.Berlusconi declared "the campaign is already on" and insisted he's running "out of a sense of responsibility" toward recession-plagued Italy. For months, he had been coy about whether he would run again. But on Saturday he claimed that a search for a new leader, like the one he was when he burst into politics in the early 1990s, failed, and so "out of desperation" for lack of alternative, he was jumping into the race.Italian media have reported that Berlusconi was particularly irked by Monti's Cabinet approval, earlier in the week, of a measure that would ban from running for office anyone sentenced to more than two years in prison after convictions are definitely upheld in cases of terrorism, organized crime and offenses in public office, including corruption.Berlusconi's tax fraud conviction in October carries a four-year sentence, but the case could be dismissed if the statute of limitations runs out before all appeals are exhausted.Critics have contended that Berlusconi expended much of his efforts as premier to push through legislation tailor-made to help him in his legal woes, and any new term in the premier's office could offer a similar opportunity.Since his last election bid, in 2008, Berlusconi has lost the key support of its biggest coalition partner, the Northern League, which refused to support Monti's government. But the League, whose founder, Umberto Bossi, has been tarnished by scandal, hasn't ruled out forging a new election alliance with Berlusconi.

NEWS,10.11.2012

Obama 'open to compromise' to avoid cuts

Newly re-elected President Barack Obama has offered to deal with Republicans to avert a looming US fiscal calamity but insisted a tax increase for the very rich must be part of the bargain.Obama reminded Republicans that his approach to avoiding steep tax hikes and spending cuts due in January, which could trigger another recession, had just won the backing of Americans at the polls.He spoke just hours after John Boehner, the Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, had repeated his party's commitment not to raise anyone's tax rates as part of a deal to address the fiscal crisis.In his first event at the White House since beating Republican Mitt Romney in Tuesday's election, Obama called on Congress to work with him to produce a plan and invited congressional leaders to meet with him next week."I'm not wedded to every detail of my plan. I'm open to compromise. I'm open to new ideas," he said.The "fiscal cliff" of steep government spending cuts and tax increases due to be implemented under existing law in early 2013 is Obama's most pressing challenge after winning a second term.Aimed at cutting the federal budget deficit, the planned measures could take an estimated $600 billion out of the economy and severely hinder economic growth.While striking a conciliatory tone toward the Republican House majority, Obama said voters supported his ideas, including raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans."I just want to point out, this was a central question during the election. It was debated over and over again. And on Tuesday night we found out that the majority of Americans agree with my approach," he said.Earlier, Boehner called on Obama to play a more active role in addressing the issue and urged the president to take the lead in negotiations."This is an opportunity for the president to lead. This is his moment to engage the Congress and work towards a solution that can pass both chambers," Boehner told a news conference.While disagreeing on immediate measures to avert the looming crisis, Obama and Republicans may find common ground in calls for enactment over the next six months of a larger package of deficit reduction measures, including a rewrite of US tax laws.The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reiterated on Thursday that if left unaddressed, the abrupt fiscal tightening would knock the economy back into recession, with unemployment rates soaring back to about 9%. The rate is now 7.9%.But it also warned of a crisis ahead if the United States does not stem the growth of its exploding deficit.Partisan squabbling over the budget crisis will also harm the US economy, according to a strong majority of economists polled after Tuesday's presidential election.

Chavez On Obama Reelection: President Should Forget Global Wars, Fix Domestic Problems

 

The U.S. government's chief antagonist in Latin America, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, has advised newly re-elected U.S. President Barack Obama to avoid further entanglement in international conflicts and concentrate on fixing internal problems."He should reflect first on his own nation, which has a lot of economic and social problems. It's a divided, socially fractured country with a super-elite exploiting the people," the socialist president said late on Thursday in his first reaction to Obama's victory this week.The maverick Chavez, who has inherited Fidel Castro's mantle as Latin America's most voluble challenger of U.S. power and policy, said it was time Obama pulled back from global affairs."He should dedicate himself to governing his country and forget dividing and invading other nations," added Chavez, who has constantly criticized U.S. involvement in Iraq, Afghanistan and other hot spots around the world.To the disappointment of the U.S. government, Chavez was re-elected for another six-year term in October, providing a continued platform to implement his self-styled socialist revolution and keep railing against Washington.The 58-year-old Chavez, a quieter figure these days after a year of debilitating treatment for two bouts of cancer, had backed Obama over Republican challenger Mitt Romney in the White House.Nevertheless, he does not disguise his disappointment in Obama, accusing him of perpetuating the same aggressive foreign policies as his predecessor, George W. Bush.Since his Oct. 7 presidential election victory over opposition challenge Henrique Capriles, Chavez has been relatively subdued, only popping up on state television once or twice a week in meetings with ministers.He has made no major new policy announcements, beyond promising more efficiency in government and a widening of socialist "communes" across Venezuelan society.Many Venezuelans expect a devaluation of the bolivar currency in coming months the black market rate is three times the official one and perhaps more nationalizations in an economy where Chavez has radically increased state ownership.Speaking at a Cabinet meeting, Chavez made light of nationalization concerns, urging businesses not to fear him."Come and invest! Don't believe the fairy tale that we're going to expropriate you," he said in comments on state TV.Earlier in the week, Chavez plied the same line, espousing a supposed new moderation toward private business that critics scoff at as hypocritical and barely believable."It's totally false that I have a plan to expropriate everyone," he said then. "Don't be deceived by that tale of 'here comes the wolf.' Lies. I'm urging you to come and work."He was less conciliatory in his view of Venezuela's upcoming state elections on Dec. 16, casting them in his Thursday appearance as a continuation of the state's battle against "counter-revolutionary" candidates of "the bourgeoisie.""We have to keep fighting this ideological confrontation," he urged his candidates for governorships in the 23 states.The most closely watched vote is in Miranda state, where incumbent governor Capriles aims to hold off a challenge from Elias Jaua, a heavyweight Chavez ally and former vice president.Should Capriles lose, it would dent his status as Venezuela's main opposition leader and deal another blow to the coalition of anti-Chavez parties already demoralized by their failure to oust him from the presidency.However, pollster IVAD put Capriles way ahead this week, with 55 percent of voter intentions versus 34 percent for Jaua. The opposition currently holds seven states.

A Trade Policy for President Obama's Second Term

 

President Obama's trade policy in his first term included working with Congress to pass free trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama, continuing negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and expanding it to include Canada and Mexico. Moreover, Obama set a goal of doubling exports by 2014, established a trade enforcement council and increased WTO dispute settlement to enforce existing international trade laws. He also effectively managed the complex U.S.China economic relationship, getting China to more effectively protect US intellectual property rights and ending China's so-called indigenous innovation policies. During the next four years the president should build on this progress and develop a comprehensive trade policy that does three things: 1) builds greater cooperation with China 2) pursues comprehensive and high quality free trade agreements; and 3) articulates a vision for moving the WTO Doha Round forward.The size of U.S.-China trade makes building this bilateral relationship key to achieving Obama's goal of doubling exports and for making progress on broader U.S. goals on an international level. But the size and growing trade deficit - which in 2011 was $295 billion and is on track to be even larger in 2012 - feeds concerns about unfair Chinese business practices and American economic and manufacturing decline, which ultimately makes advancing the economic relationship with China rather difficult.The challenge for Obama is that the size of trade deficit is unlikely going to change much in the next four years because of China's role in global supply chains as the major assembly point for goods made from components sourced from South East Asia, Europe, the U.S. and Japan. In this light, the U.S.-China trade deficit is the accumulation of declining U.S. trade deficits with countries like Japan, South Korea and Malaysia as businesses in these countries have shifted production to China. This shift to more efficient and cost-effective production conditions has led to significant decreases in the prices of these imported goods to American businesses and consumers. One way to reduce the bilateral trade deficit would be to address China's undervalued currency. An undervalued renminbi (RMB) has the effect of making Chinese imports cheaper and American exports to China more expensive. Therefore a revaluation would reduce the deficit by increasing U.S. exports to China and reducing imports from China. The dispute about China's undervalued currency has also negatively affected broader U.S. trade goals, such as concluding the WTO Doha Round since the undervalued RMB caused developing country to resist further reductions in tariffs due to concerns about competition from cheap Chinese imports. That said, the net economic impacts of China's undervalued currency for the U.S. are unclear as a lower RMB also leads to cheaper goods for American consumers and businesses. While an appreciating RMB will likely lead businesses to relocate to lower cost countries and thereby reduce the U.S.China trade deficit, it will not lead to a decrease in the overall U.S. trade deficit.But reducing these US concerns about the RMB and the trade deficit, other areas for cooperation with China like clean energy should open up. President Obama supports developing green energy in the U.S. and China's 12th Five Year Plan includes ambitious domestic renewable energy goals. These goals could be complimentary with the U.S. specializing in high-end green technologies and services and China manufacturing components like solar photovoltaic cells. A liberalized trading regime in green energy would underpin this outcome, leading to the most efficient allocation of resources and reducing the costs of renewable energy in both countries. But concerns in the U.S. about Chinese subsidies for renewable energy and a U.S. focus on developing green manufacturing capacity has already led to WTO litigation. Both countries should instead use the trading system to support this common goal and build on the recent agreement in APEC to reduce tariffs on a range of environmental goods by expanding the list of environmental goods and addressing other trade barriers affecting green energy goods and services.Currently, the Trans-Pacific Partnership is the only significant free trade agreement (FTA) the U.S. is pursuing and completing the negotiations should certainly be a priority for the next Obama administration. The main outstanding issue is whether Japan will join the current negotiations. While Japan's participation would slow down the talks, it would secure Japan's support for the trade and investment rules that the U.S. wants for the Asia-Pacific region and provide economic heft to the TPP. All this would increase the incentive for other countries to join the TPP and create further momentum toward an Asia-Pacific FTA, reinforcing Obama's broader strategic "pivot" towards Asia.A big potential new FTA is with the EU the US's largest bilateral trading partner. Most tariffs between the US and the EU are already low, so improving market access will require addressing so-called behind the border regulatory measures such as on genetically modified organisms, vehicle safety standards and pharmaceutical health and safety laws. Prior experience addressing trade barriers in the Transatlantic Economic Council suggests that making progress on these issues will not be easy. However a US-EU FTA would certainly deliver economic benefits for the U.S. and European Union.President Obama can be expected to continue to efforts to conclude parts of the WTO Doha Round, focusing on a services agreement, expansion of the international technology agreement and trade facilitation. However, only multilateral trade liberalization will deliver the largest economic benefits for the U.S. and globally, and the U.S. as the necessary leader and largest beneficiary of the multilateral trading system should develop a strategy for concluding the WTO Doha Round during the next four years.

NEWS,22.06.2012

Extra cash needed to bailout Spanish banks

 

Independent auditors said Spanish banks may need up to 62 billion euros in extra capital, to be filled mostly by a euro zone bailout, after Spain's medium-term borrowing costs spiralled to a euro-era record on Friday.Euro zone finance ministers met in Luxembourg to discuss how to channel up to 100 billion euros in aid to Spanish lenders weighed down by bad debts from a burst property bubble. Madrid's economy minister said a formal request would be made in days for the bailout, which was agreed two weeks ago.Many in the markets see the package as a mere prelude to a full programme for the Spanish state, which Madrid vehemently denies it will need.Spain's financial plight took centre stage a week before a European Union summit tackles long-term plans for closer fiscal and banking union in a bid to strengthen the euro's foundations, after bailouts for Greece, Ireland and Portugal failed to end a 2-1/2-year old debt crisis.To pave the way, the leaders of Germany, Italy, France and Spain will meet in Rome."We are clearly seeing additional tension and acute stress applying to both banks and sovereigns in the euro area," International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde, who attended the Luxembourg meeting, told reporters."With that in mind, the IMF believes that a determined and forceful move towards complete European monetary union should be reaffirmed."Two independent audits by consultants Roland Berger and Oliver Wyman found that Spanish banks would need between 51 and 62 billion euros in extra capital to weather a serious downturn in the economy and new losses on their books.The Bank of Spain said the 100 billion euros offered to Madrid two weeks ago would give a wide margin of error. Spain's three biggest banks would not need extra capital even in a stressed scenario, it said. The government said it did not expect to shut any banks and would restructure those in trouble.In Luxembourg, the finance ministers decided Spain should initially apply to the euro zone's temporary rescue fund, the European Financial Stability Facility, with the loan taken over by the permanent bailout fund the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) once it is up and running after July 9."The financial assistance will be provided by the EFSF until the ESM becomes available, and then it will be transferred to the ESM," Jean-Claude Juncker, who chairs the Eurogroup of finance ministers, told a news conference."We would expect the Spanish authorities to put forward a formal request for financial assistance by next Monday," he said.Such a solution should avert a problem which had scared investors: debt issued by the ESM must be paid back first in case of a Spanish default, relegating private creditors lower in the pecking order. Because the new bailout debt will originate from the EFSF it will be issued without that requirement.Earlier on Thursday, Madrid sold 2.2 billion euros in medium-term bonds, drawing strong demand almost entirely from domestic banks. Yields on 5-year paper rose to a 15-year high of 6.07%, a level regarded by analysts as unaffordable for any prolonged period."They raised 2.2 billion versus a 2 billion target, so they can raise the money," said Achilleas Georgolopoulos, a strategist at Lloyds in London."Then the (question is), are the yields threatening for the medium term? And yes, clearly they are much higher than the previous auction ... But still they can continue for a few months to fund at these levels."The finance ministers also signalled there may be some leeway for Greece, following the formation of a coalition of mainstream parties committed to the country's 130 billion euro EU/IMF bailout but determined to renegotiate some of its terms.Athens will ask lenders for two more years to hit fiscal targets and an extension to unemployment benefits as it seeks to soften the punishing terms of the bailout that saved the country from bankruptcy.Greece's euro zone partners, in particular paymaster Germany, have offered modifications but no radical re-write of the conditions attached to the lifeline agreed in March.Juncker said nothing would be decided until the troika of EU, IMF and European Central Bankers had returned to Athens for a look at the books, starting on Monday."We will have a look into the findings of the troika and then we will discuss in detail the different means and instruments which can be used," he said. "It doesn't make sense for the time being to give more precise indications on the content of the programme."

Fuel companies should justify pump prices - AA

 

Fuel companies need to tell the public why their margins are creeping higher though oil costs are dropping, the AA says.AA petrol watch spokesperson Mark Stockdale told  there is a lag between what fuel companies pay for petrol and what consumers pay at the pump."Over time margins are certainly increasing," he said."If the fuel companies are saying historically margins haven't been high enough, then they need to go to the public and explain why they think margins should be rising."Stockdale's comments follow BP's claim that the company gets bad press even though prices have fallen back under $2 for the first time in nearly a year.BP's External Affairs manager Jonty Mills told  yesterday that "there's a bit of scepticism out there and it's hard for us to get a good rap in the media"."However I think we've shown, we've dropped the price six times consecutively in the last month and a half. BP have led four of those," he said.One of BP's rivals, Gull, further cut prices for regular 91 Octane petrol to $1.959 today.But Stockdale said the rise in margin of three to four cents in the last couple of months is "too much too soon" and he does not understand what has happened over that period to justify it.Though petrol cuts have been coming "thick and fast"be paying too much at the pump."We're basing it on the margin as it was in March, and based on those numbers we think there could be a cut of about three cents per litre," he said.Stockdale thinks there should be another price cut within the next week.