Obama 'open to compromise' to avoid cuts
Newly re-elected President Barack
Obama has offered to deal with Republicans to avert a looming US fiscal
calamity but insisted a tax increase for the very rich must be part of the
bargain.Obama reminded Republicans that his approach to avoiding steep tax
hikes and spending cuts due in January, which could trigger another recession,
had just won the backing of Americans at the polls.He spoke just hours after
John Boehner, the Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, had
repeated his party's commitment not to raise anyone's tax rates as part of a
deal to address the fiscal crisis.In his first event at the White House since
beating Republican Mitt Romney in Tuesday's election, Obama called on Congress
to work with him to produce a plan and invited congressional leaders to meet
with him next week."I'm not wedded to every detail of my plan. I'm open to
compromise. I'm open to new ideas," he said.The "fiscal cliff"
of steep government spending cuts and tax increases due to be implemented under
existing law in early 2013 is Obama's most pressing challenge after winning a
second term.Aimed at cutting the federal budget deficit, the planned measures
could take an estimated $600 billion out of the economy and severely hinder
economic growth.While striking a conciliatory tone toward the Republican House
majority, Obama said voters supported his ideas, including raising taxes on the
wealthiest Americans."I just want to point out, this was a central
question during the election. It was debated over and over again. And on
Tuesday night we found out that the majority of Americans agree with my
approach," he said.Earlier, Boehner called on Obama to play a more active
role in addressing the issue and urged the president to take the lead in
negotiations."This is an opportunity for the president to lead. This is
his moment to engage the Congress and work towards a solution that can pass
both chambers," Boehner told a news conference.While disagreeing on
immediate measures to avert the looming crisis, Obama and Republicans may find
common ground in calls for enactment over the next six months of a larger
package of deficit reduction measures, including a rewrite of US tax laws.The
non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reiterated on Thursday that if left
unaddressed, the abrupt fiscal tightening would knock the economy back into
recession, with unemployment rates soaring back to about 9%. The rate is now
7.9%.But it also warned of a crisis ahead if the United States does not stem the growth of its exploding deficit.Partisan squabbling
over the budget crisis will also harm the US economy, according to
a strong majority of economists polled after Tuesday's presidential election.
Chavez On Obama Reelection: President Should Forget Global Wars, Fix Domestic Problems
The U.S. government's chief antagonist in Latin America, Hugo Chavez of
Venezuela, has advised newly re-elected U.S. President Barack Obama to avoid
further entanglement in international conflicts and concentrate on fixing
internal problems."He should reflect first on his own nation, which has a
lot of economic and social problems. It's a divided, socially fractured country
with a super-elite exploiting the people," the socialist president said
late on Thursday in his first reaction to Obama's victory this week.The
maverick Chavez, who has inherited Fidel Castro's mantle as Latin America's
most voluble challenger of U.S. power and policy, said it was time Obama pulled
back from global affairs."He should dedicate himself to governing his
country and forget dividing and invading other nations," added Chavez, who
has constantly criticized U.S. involvement in Iraq, Afghanistan and other hot
spots around the world.To the disappointment of the U.S. government, Chavez was
re-elected for another six-year term in October, providing a continued platform
to implement his self-styled socialist revolution and keep railing against
Washington.The 58-year-old Chavez, a quieter figure these days after a year of
debilitating treatment for two bouts of cancer, had backed Obama over
Republican challenger Mitt Romney in the White House.Nevertheless, he does not
disguise his disappointment in Obama, accusing him of perpetuating the same
aggressive foreign policies as his predecessor, George W. Bush.Since his Oct. 7
presidential election victory over opposition challenge Henrique Capriles,
Chavez has been relatively subdued, only popping up on state television once or
twice a week in meetings with ministers.He has made no major new policy
announcements, beyond promising more efficiency in government and a widening of
socialist "communes" across Venezuelan society.Many Venezuelans expect
a devaluation of the bolivar currency in coming months the black market rate is
three times the official one and perhaps more nationalizations in an economy
where Chavez has radically increased state ownership.Speaking at a Cabinet
meeting, Chavez made light of nationalization concerns, urging businesses not
to fear him."Come and invest! Don't believe the fairy tale that we're
going to expropriate you," he said in comments on state TV.Earlier in the
week, Chavez plied the same line, espousing a supposed new moderation toward
private business that critics scoff at as hypocritical and barely
believable."It's totally false that I have a plan to expropriate
everyone," he said then. "Don't be deceived by that tale of 'here
comes the wolf.' Lies. I'm urging you to come and work."He was less
conciliatory in his view of Venezuela's upcoming state elections on Dec. 16, casting them in his Thursday
appearance as a continuation of the state's battle against
"counter-revolutionary" candidates of "the bourgeoisie.""We
have to keep fighting this ideological confrontation," he urged his
candidates for governorships in the 23 states.The most closely watched vote is
in Miranda state, where incumbent governor Capriles aims to hold off a
challenge from Elias Jaua, a heavyweight Chavez ally and former vice
president.Should Capriles lose, it would dent his status as Venezuela's main
opposition leader and deal another blow to the coalition of anti-Chavez parties
already demoralized by their failure to oust him from the presidency.However,
pollster IVAD put Capriles way ahead this week, with 55 percent of voter
intentions versus 34 percent for Jaua. The opposition currently holds seven
states.
A Trade Policy for President Obama's Second Term
President Obama's trade policy in
his first term included working with Congress to pass free trade agreements
with South Korea, Colombia and Panama, continuing negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and expanding
it to include Canada and Mexico. Moreover, Obama set a goal of doubling exports by 2014, established a
trade enforcement council and increased WTO dispute settlement to enforce
existing international trade laws. He also effectively managed the complex
U.S.China economic relationship, getting China to more effectively protect US
intellectual property rights and ending China's so-called indigenous innovation
policies. During the next four years the president should build on this
progress and develop a comprehensive trade policy that does three things: 1)
builds greater cooperation with China 2) pursues comprehensive and high quality
free trade agreements; and 3) articulates a vision for moving the WTO Doha
Round forward.The size of U.S.-China trade makes building this bilateral
relationship key to achieving Obama's goal of doubling exports and for making
progress on broader U.S. goals on an international level. But the size and
growing trade deficit - which in 2011 was $295 billion and is on track to be
even larger in 2012 - feeds concerns about unfair Chinese business practices
and American economic and manufacturing decline, which ultimately makes
advancing the economic relationship with China rather difficult.The challenge
for Obama is that the size of trade deficit is unlikely going to change much in
the next four years because of China's role in global supply chains as the
major assembly point for goods made from components sourced from South East
Asia, Europe, the U.S. and Japan. In this light, the U.S.-China trade deficit
is the accumulation of declining U.S. trade deficits with
countries like Japan, South Korea and Malaysia as businesses in these countries have shifted production to China. This shift to more
efficient and cost-effective production conditions has led to significant
decreases in the prices of these imported goods to American businesses and
consumers. One way to reduce the bilateral trade deficit would be to address China's undervalued
currency. An undervalued renminbi (RMB) has the effect of making Chinese
imports cheaper and American exports to China more expensive.
Therefore a revaluation would reduce the deficit by increasing U.S. exports to China and reducing imports
from China. The dispute about China's undervalued
currency has also negatively affected broader U.S. trade goals, such as
concluding the WTO Doha Round since the undervalued RMB caused developing
country to resist further reductions in tariffs due to concerns about
competition from cheap Chinese imports. That said, the net economic impacts of China's undervalued
currency for the U.S. are unclear as a lower RMB also leads to cheaper goods for American
consumers and businesses. While an appreciating RMB will likely lead businesses
to relocate to lower cost countries and thereby reduce the U.S.China trade
deficit, it will not lead to a decrease in the overall U.S. trade deficit.But
reducing these US concerns about the RMB and the trade deficit, other areas for
cooperation with China like clean energy should open up. President Obama
supports developing green energy in the U.S. and China's 12th Five Year Plan
includes ambitious domestic renewable energy goals. These goals could be
complimentary with the U.S. specializing in
high-end green technologies and services and China manufacturing
components like solar photovoltaic cells. A liberalized trading regime in green
energy would underpin this outcome, leading to the most efficient allocation of
resources and reducing the costs of renewable energy in both countries. But
concerns in the U.S. about Chinese subsidies for renewable energy and a U.S. focus on developing
green manufacturing capacity has already led to WTO litigation. Both countries
should instead use the trading system to support this common goal and build on
the recent agreement in APEC to reduce tariffs on a range of environmental
goods by expanding the list of environmental goods and addressing other trade
barriers affecting green energy goods and services.Currently, the Trans-Pacific
Partnership is the only significant free trade agreement (FTA) the U.S. is
pursuing and completing the negotiations should certainly be a priority for the
next Obama administration. The main outstanding issue is whether Japan will join the current
negotiations. While Japan's participation would
slow down the talks, it would secure Japan's support for the
trade and investment rules that the U.S. wants for the
Asia-Pacific region and provide economic heft to the TPP. All this would
increase the incentive for other countries to join the TPP and create further
momentum toward an Asia-Pacific FTA, reinforcing Obama's broader strategic
"pivot" towards Asia.A big potential new FTA is with the EU the US's largest bilateral
trading partner. Most tariffs between the US and the EU are
already low, so improving market access will require addressing so-called behind
the border regulatory measures such as on genetically modified organisms,
vehicle safety standards and pharmaceutical health and safety laws. Prior
experience addressing trade barriers in the Transatlantic Economic Council
suggests that making progress on these issues will not be easy. However a US-EU
FTA would certainly deliver economic benefits for the U.S. and European
Union.President Obama can be expected to continue to efforts to conclude parts
of the WTO Doha Round, focusing on a services agreement, expansion of the
international technology agreement and trade facilitation. However, only
multilateral trade liberalization will deliver the largest economic benefits
for the U.S. and globally, and the U.S. as the necessary leader and largest
beneficiary of the multilateral trading system should develop a strategy for
concluding the WTO Doha Round during the next four years.
No comments:
Post a Comment