Global economy enjoys sweeter sentiment
Global investors have
entered 2013 in buoyant but not yet
exuberant mood‚ according to the BofA Merrill Lynch Fund Manager Survey for January.The new year sees asset
allocators assigning more funds to equities than at any time since February
2011‚ while their confidence in the world’s economic outlook has reached its
most positive level since April 2010.Investors’ appetite for risk in their
portfolios is now at its highest in nine years‚ while an increasing number
judge equities as undervalued – particularly in Europe. Moreover‚ investors
have reduced cash holdings to 3.8% from 4.2% in December.This marks the most
positive reading of this measure of willingness to
hold riskier investment assets since April 2011‚ though it has not reached
levels that would represent a contrarian sell signal.Participants’ perception
of the US fiscal crisis as the biggest “tail risk” for asset markets has calmed
(down nearly 20% points in two months)‚ though it remains
their largest concern. Views of China remain very positive‚ with a net 63%
still anticipating a stronger economy this year‚ but one in seven sees a
Chinese hard landing as their number one risk.Investors’ bullishness reflects a
growing confidence in economic recovery. A net 59% now expect the global
economy to strengthen this year‚ compared to a net 40% a month ago. This marks
the panel’s most positive outlook since April 2010. An increasing proportion of
respondents expect inflation to pick up as well.“Following the resolution of
the US fiscal cliff‚ sentiment has surged. Half of investors now tell us that
they would sell government bonds to buy higher-beta stocks‚ which is consistent
with increasing growth and inflation expectations‚ and with our call for a
‘Great Rotation’ to start in 2013‚” said Michael Hartnett‚ chief investment
strategist at BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. “While the survey reveals
pockets of exuberance‚ undemanding valuations in Europe should underpin
equities unless earnings growth fails to materialize‚” added John Bilton‚
European investment strategist.49% of respondents now expect government bonds to
be sold to fund purchases of higher beta equities and sustain the “risk on”
rally. Last month‚ in contrast‚ only 37% saw the instrument as the likeliest
source while 28% expected this to be reduction of cash balances (now 22%) and
19% expected defensive equities (now 15%).In this environment‚ the perception
of Italy as a substantial “tail risk” for Europe has declined sharply. Only 17%
of the panel now views the country as the biggest threat to the European story‚
compared to 26% in December. Assessments of the threats from France and Spain
have worsened from last month‚ however‚ up to 34% and 29%‚ respectively.The
panel has shifted its stance on financial stocks strongly‚ moving to its first net
overweight in global bank names since February 2007 following a 15% move versus
last month. Nevertheless‚ banks are still perceived as the global equity
market’s most undervalued sector. The existing overweight in insurance has also
been extended‚ particularly in Europe‚ and now stands its highest level since
January 2007.In contrast‚ appetite for telecoms stocks has fallen to a net 25%
underweight. This marks the sector’s lowest weighting from asset allocators
since December 2005. While still in positive territory‚ pharmaceuticals have
declined to a net 11% overweight. Their fall from a net 24% last month is
January’s largest sectoral move.The perception that consumer staples companies
are the most overvalued has also accelerated month-on-month.The new Japanese
government’s policies continue to improve the country’s outlook. Its growth
composite indicator now stands at a striking reading of 96.Against this
background‚ global fund managers are turning more positive. A net 3% are now
overweight Japanese equities‚ a sharp reversal of last month’s net 20%
underweight. The proportion of investors viewing Japan as the most
undervalued market increased this month as well‚ while a growing number see it
as having the most favourable outlook for corporate profits.
US could lose gold-chip rating
The United States could lose its top
credit rating from a leading agency for the second time if there is a delay in
raising the country's debt ceiling, Fitch Ratings warned Tuesday.Congress has
to increase the country's debt limit, which effectively rules how much debt the
US can have, by March 1 or face a potential default.There are fears that the
debate will descend into the sort of squabbling and political brinkmanship that
marked the last effort to raise the ceiling in the summer of 2011. The US
Treasury Department warned then that it had nearly reached a point where it
would be unable "to meet our commitments
securely".Standard & Poor's was so concerned by the dysfunctional
nature of the 2011 debate that it stripped the US of its triple A rating for
the first time in the country's history. Like Fitch, Moody's has a negative
view on the US outlook."The pressure on the US rating, if anything,
is increasing," said David Riley, managing director of Fitch Ratings'
global sovereigns division. "We thought the 2011 crisis was a one-off
event ... if we have a repeat we will place the US rating under
review."Fitch already has a negative outlook on the US as the country's
debt burden has risen to around 100% of its gross domestic product, and has
said it will make a decision on the rating this year, regardless of how the
debt ceiling discussions pan out. The US government reached its statutory debt
limit of nearly $16.4 trillion at the end of 2012 but has engineered
extraordinary measures that should see it through February.Riley's comments
come just two weeks after US lawmakers agreed a budget deal with the White
House that avoided the so-called fiscal cliff of automatic tax increases and
spending cuts that many economists thought could plunge the US economy, the
world's largest, back into recession. Relief that a deal was cobbled together,
albeit at the final hour, is one of the reasons why sentiment in the financial
markets has been buoyant in the first trading days of the new year. Many stock
indexes around the world are trading at multi-year highs."The fiscal cliff
bullet was dodged .... (but it's) a short-term patch," said Riley.Riley
warned that the different arms of the US government still have
a number of issues to address. As well as increasing the debt ceiling, they
have to agree to spending cuts that were delayed as part of the fiscal cliff
agreement and back measures to avoid a government shutdown, potentially in
March.Though short-term fixes are more likely than not, Riley said the US
political environment is not as good as it should be for a country holding the
gold-chip AAA rating. The past few years, Riley said, have been marked by
"self-inflicted crises" between deadlines.The major reason behind the
lack of swift action in the US is that the Democrats
control the White House and the Senate, while the Republicans have a solid
majority in the House of Representatives. Both sides have differing visions of
the role of the state in society and often varying political objectives.Despite
his cautious tone on the rating, Riley said the US has a number of huge
advantages and that getting the country's public finances into shape will not
require the same level of austerity that many countries in Europe have had to
enact over the past few years, partly because the US economy is growing at a
steady rate.Other factors that support the US's AAA rating are the country's
economic dynamism, lower financial sector risks, the rule of law as well as the
global benchmark status of the country's bonds and the dollar, Fitch
says.However it says these "fundamental credit strengths are being eroded
by the large, albeit steadily declining, structural budget deficit and high and
rising public debt".
US debt ceiling hike critical
Federal Reserve
Chairperson Ben Bernanke on Monday urged US lawmakers to lift the country's
borrowing limit to avoid a potentially disastrous debt default, warning that
the economy was still at risk from political gridlock over the deficit. Likening
Congress to a family arguing that it can improve its credit rating by deciding
not to pay its credit card bill, Bernanke said that raising the legal borrowing
limit was not the same as authorising new government spending. "It's very,
very important that Congress takes the necessary action to raise the debt
ceiling to avoid a situation where our government doesn't pay its bills,"
he told an event sponsored by the University of Michigan. The US Treasury says the country
bumped into its borrowing limit on December 31, and it is now employing special
measures to enable the government to meet its financial obligations. US
leaders did agree at the beginning of January to extend tax cuts for all
American families earning less than $450 000 a year to avoid a portion of a "fiscal cliff" of policies that
Bernanke had warned would likely tip the economy into recession. But lawmakers
must still navigate the debt limit as well as thrash out a deal over drastic
automatic spending cuts that were postponed until March 1."We're not out
of the woods because we are approaching a number of other fiscal critical
watersheds coming up," Bernanke warned on Monday.The Fed last month opted
to keep buying $85bn worth of Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities a
month until it saw a significant improvement in the labor market outlook, in an
aggressive bid to push down borrowing costs and spur hiring.It has held
interest rates at nearly zero since December 2008 and has said it will keep
them at this ultra-low level until unemployment reaches 6.5%, provided that
inflation does not look likely to breach a threshold of 2.5%. US unemployment
in December remained at a lofty 7.8%.The president of the San Francisco Federal
Reserve Bank, John Williams, said earlier on
Monday that he expected the central bank's bond buying would be needed
"well into the second half of 2013." Minutes from the Fed's December
11-12 policy meeting released earlier this month showed several policy makers
favored ending the bond purchases well before the end of this year, while a few
officials thought the purchases would be warranted until the end of 2013.A
third policy-maker who spoke on Monday, Dennis Lockhart, president of the
Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank, stressed that the open-ended, or
meeting-to-meeting nature, of the Fed's commitment to buy assets did not mean
the policy would continue indefinitely. "'Open ended' does not mean
'without bound.' The program is not 'QE Infinity,'" he told the Rotary
Club of Atlanta.
No comments:
Post a Comment