NEWS,24.07.2012

Germany's credit rating downgraded

Germany's Aaa credit rating outlook has been lowered to negative by Moody's.The rating agency cited "rising uncertainty" about Europe's debt crisis.Risks that Greece may leave the euro and the "increasing likelihood" of help for Spain and Italy also caused the downgrade."Given the greater ability to absorb the costs associated with this support, this burden will likely fall most heavily on more highly rated member states if the euro area is to be preserved in its current form," Moody's said. Germany's vulnerable banking system, which Moody's deems exposed to the most stressed euro countries, could leave them open to further deepening of the crisis.However, it will retain its Aaa rating because of the country's "advanced and diversified economy" with high productivity and strong demand for German products.Finland held on to its top ranking, getting a stable outlook from Moody's.

 

Deutsche Bank's Internal Libor Investigation Finds Deutsche Bank Mostly Innocent

 

Great news, you guys. We can go ahead and scratch at least one bank off the list of egregious interest-rate manipulators. That's because this bank has heroically determined that it is totally innocent. Almost totally, anyway.Deutsche Bank, the biggest German bank, has carefully investigated its own role in the habitual, fraudulent, global rigging of Libor, the most important interest rate in the world. And you might want to sit down for this, but Deutsche Bank has determined, to what we can only imagine is its own profound relief, that Deutsche Bank was only barely involved in the scandal. Hardly any involvement, really. If you blur your eyes a bit, it even kind of looks like Deutsche Bank wasn't involved at all. Certainly not in its top executive ranks. That's the way Deutsche Bank would like you to see it, anyway.Hmm, one small problem, though: Handelsblatt is reporting that Deutsche Bank is bracing for "a huge fine" in the Libor scandal, setting aside between $300 million and $1 billion -- the middle point of which would be higher than the $450 million Barclays paid. Does that sound like a bank that really expects to get out of this without any mud getting splashed on the C-suite?Anyway, we can only imagine that if Deutsche Bank is indeed planning on paying such a huge fine, then it is only doing so out of the goodness of its heart, a sense of civic duty really. Because it turns out, according to Deutsche Bank's investigation, that every bit of Deutsche Bank's involvement in the constant, gleeful rigging of Libor for years came down to just two very bad Deutsche Apples, who were fired last year. Both of those, let's call them, slimeballs apparently were part of the global Libor-rigging cartel that involved nearly every large bank in the world. But they're gone now, and we can only imagine that their desks have been taken out back and chopped into dust, that their pictures have been photoshopped out of all the company's birthday-party photos, and that their names are no longer spoken around Deutsche Bank's offices in any tones other than scorn or maybe shame.A Deutsche Bank internal probe has found that two of its former traders may have been involved in colluding to manipulate global benchmark interest rates but there was no indication of failure at the top of the organization, three people close to the investigation said.No indication of failure at the top of the organization! This will be a tremendous relief to spanking-new Deutsche Bank chief Anshu Jain, who is already on thin ice with the Germans because he came up from the bank's investment-banking arm. Germans don't much like investment bankers. To make matters worse, it was Jain's investment-banking arm that happened to be in charge of these bad-apple traders that were fiendishly rigging Libor. A major scandal that originated in Mr. Jain's area of the bank could damage his chances to continue on as sole CEO of the bank after co-head Jürgen Fitschen's contract expires in three years.Thank goodness for Jain that such a risk is apparently all gone now, according to Deutsche Bank's unflinching review of its own leadership. In fact, Reuters seems to imply that Deutsche Bank will likely avoid the sort of unpleasantness that beset Barclays, where the chairman, CEO and chief operating officer all walked the plank as a result of that bank's admitted Libor manipulation. And we can only imagine that the ongoing investigations by "regulators and governmental entities" in the U.S. and Europe, including German markets regulator BaFin, are now a mere formality. All that's needed now is to bring those two pesky scapegoats to justice, and Deutsche Bank can get back to doing the Lord's work.

Italy pushes for Sicilian recovery plan

Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti imposed a compulsory plan to restore financial stability to the cash-strapped Sicily region and overhaul its bloated public administration, a government statement said today.The statement, issued after a meeting between Monti and regional governor Raffaele Lombardo, said the leaders had agreed "a plan for financial recovery and reorganisation of the region's public administration, with a binding timeframe and objectives".The statement stopped short of saying that Sicily would be placed under special administration but made it clear that the programme would be monitored from Rome and that it would insist on cuts to the region's notoriously swollen payroll."The programme is to be finalised in the coming weeks and will be formally signed by the regional and national governments," the statement said.Sicily, which accounts for about 5.5% of Italy's gross domestic product, has been at the centre of growing concerns over the financial stability of Italy's regional and city governments after Monti said last week there were serious concerns about the possibility that it could default.The autonomous island region has some 5.3 billion euros in debt, a long history of waste and mismanagement and an outsized public sector payroll that critics say has been used by successive governments to buy votes.Officials have since played down fears of an immediate crisis with Interior Minister Annamario Cancellieri saying on Monday that there was no risk either of default or of a special government administrator being appointed.Worries about Sicily come as Italy itself moves to the forefront of concerns in the euro zone crisis, with the cost of servicing huge debts jumping on contagion fears for the bloc's third biggest economy linked to the worsening plight of Spain.Following the meeting, Lombardo repeated his own insistence that Sicily had sound and sustainable finances and dismissed talk of default as "rubbish" but confirmed he would resign by the end of the month as previously agreed.He also said the government had released 240 million euros to help cover funding gaps in the health system, one of the regional administration's key responsibilities.While the plight of Italy's regional and municipal authorities has not reached the levels seen in Spain, where several regions have been reported to be close to asking for state aid, there have been growing signs of strain from successive cuts to government transfers.On Tuesday, mayors from around Italy held a demonstration outside the Senate to protest against the cuts which they say will force them to curtail vital local services.The Corte dei Conti, Italy's top public finance watchdog, has made a damning series of criticisms of the regional administration in Sicily, which has overseen a steady deterioration in the island's finances over the past decade.With an unemployment rate of 19.5%, almost twice the national average, Sicily is among the regions hardest hit by the recession but its public sector payroll has been constantly increased, particularly in the health sector.

NEWS,28.6.2012

Europe's greatest threat

Financial markets slide towards disaster, scarcely pausing to celebrate the "success" of the Greek election or the deal to recapitalise Spanish banks, the euro project is finally revealing its fatal flaw. One country poses an existential threat to Europe – and it is not Greece, Italy or Spain. Every serious proposal to resolve the euro crisis since 2009 – haircuts for bank bondholders, more realistic fiscal consolidation targets, jointly guaranteed eurobonds, a pan-European bailout fund, quantitative easing by the European Central Bank (ECB) – has been vetoed by Germany, and this pattern looks likely to be repeated next week. Nobody should be surprised that Germany has become the greatest threat to Europe. After all, this has happened twice before since 1914. To state this unmentionable fact is not to impugn Germans with original sin, but merely to note Germany's unusual geopolitical situation. Germany is too big and powerful to coexist comfortably with its European neighbours in any political structure ruled purely by national interests. Yet it isn't big and powerful enough to dominate its neighbours decisively, as the US dominates North America or China will dominate the Far East. Wise German politicians recognised this inherent instability after 1945 and abandoned the realpolitik of national interest in favour of the idealism of European unification. Instead of trying to create a "German Europe" the new national goal was to build a "European Germany". Unfortunately, this lesson seems to have been forgotten by Angela Merkel. Whatever the intellectual arguments for or against German-imposed austerity or the German-designed fiscal compact, there can be no dispute about their political import. Merkel's stated goal is now to create a "German Europe", with every nation living, working and running its government according to German rules. Merkel doubtless believes that she is helping Europe when she maternally instructs the Greeks, Italians and Spaniards to "do their homework" and so become good little Germans. But like its less benign predecessors, this effort to impose German hegemony is guaranteed to fail. Europe's leaders must therefore sart considering a previously unmentionable question, perhaps as soon as the current summit, if the euro crisis intensifies. This question is not whether Europe will agree to live under German leadership, but whether Germany will agree to live under EU leadership – or whether the other nations must form a united front against Germany to prevent the destruction of Europe, as they have repeatedly in the past. To be specific, the euro's only chance of survival now depends on a decisive move towards political and fiscal union. Angela Merkel plays lip service to such political union, even claiming that democratic accountability is her main condition for financial rescues; but what she means is accountability to German voters, German newspapers and German constitutional judges. She promises to "do whatever it takes to save the euro" but vetoes anything that might actually work, claiming deference to German public opinion or national interests. Europe must now call this bluff. At the summit, France, Italy and Spain can turn the tables on Merkel by presenting her with an ultimatum. Led by President Hollande, who has abandoned president Sarkozy's Gaullist pretensions of parity with Germany, the big three Mediterranean countries could agree on a programme that really might save the euro: a banking union, followed by jointly issued eurobonds and backed by ECB quantitative easing. If Merkel tried to block these policies, the others could politely invite her to leave the euro, since Germany's political pressures evidently made membership impossible on terms its partners could accept – essentially the proposition Merkel put last month to Greece. Without Germany, the eurozone would have much smaller internal imbalances and much more political coherence, with a much weaker currency and higher inflation, both of which would make debts easier to resolve. Merkel would probably insist on Germany's legal right to remain within the euro, ironically echoing the Greek position. At this point the other nations could play their trump card: to reduce interest rates and make their economies more competitive by weakening the euro, the debtor nations could vote for unlimited bond purchases by the ECB. The Germans on the ECB council would doubtless oppose this, but even with support from Finland, Slovakia, and perhaps Austria and Holland, Germany could command no more than seven votes out of 23. Germany would then face the very same existential choice about its relations with Europe that Merkel has inflicted on Greece and other debtor nations. Germans will almost certainly support the political concessions that might give the euro a chance of survival, including fiscal transfers and some mutualisation of debts, once they realise that their only alternative is isolation from the rest of Europe. But before they agree to a European Germany, voters may need to be reminded that trying to create a German Europe always leads to disaster.