Showing posts with label rich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rich. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

NEWS,18 AND 19.06.2013



Ranks of the rich swelling - report


The number of millionaires in the world jumped 9.2% to 12 million last year, in part because of simultaneous strength in the stock, bond and real estate markets, according to a study of the high-net-worth population.
The survey, released on Tuesday by RBC Wealth Management and Capgemini Financial Services, tracked high-net-worth people, whom it defined as those with more than $1m that they can invest.
North America was home to the highest number of millionaires - 3.7m. But the study projected that the Asia-Pacific region, which held the top spot in 2011, would reclaim it.
Part of the strength in North America came from rising equities markets - the Standard & Poor's 500 stock index gained 13% in 2012. North American investors put 37% of their money into stocks, a higher proportion than people in the Asia-Pacific region, where investors tend to be more conservative, the study said.
The amount of wealth held by the world's richest people also increased substantially, rising 10% to $46.2 trillion, well above the pre-economic crisis level of $40.7 trillion in 2007.
The study forecast high-net-worth wealth would increase 6.5% annually to $55.8 trillion by 2015, mainly because of growth in the Asia-Pacific region.
The survey found that 53% of wealthy US individuals would prefer to have a single firm handle their financial accounts.
However, a 2011 study from Boston-based research firm Aite Group showed more than half of high-net worth investors held their money in four or more financial institutions.
"Having one super-adviser would be preferred, but finding someone who can do that well is hard," said Aite analyst Sophie Schmitt.
The RBC-Capgemini survey polled more than 4 000 high-net-worth people globally in February and March, including 736 Americans.

Switzerland buries US tax law


Swiss lawmakers dealt a death blow on Wednesday to a draft law which aimed to protect the country's banks from criminal charges in the United States for helping wealthy Americans evade tax.
The Swiss government has warned that the bill's failure could prompt impatient US prosecutors to indict banks, though it could still use an executive order to allow them to hand over data to try to avoid criminal charges.
The bill, which lawmakers from both the centre-left and right opposed for widely differing reasons, was designed to let banks sidestep Swiss secrecy laws by disclosing their US dealings so they could avoid prosecution. With or without the law, they will still seek out of court settlements with US authorities that could cost the industry as much as $10bn.
Parliament's lower house voted 123 to 63 against debating the legislation, effectively killing the law, even though the upper house had confirmed its support earlier in the day.
Switzerland's banking lobby expressed regret about the vote and urged the government to do everything possible to help banks reach settlements under a US Department of Justice programme.
"Switzerland must not take the risk of a further indictment of a bank lightly," the Swiss Bankers Association said in a statement.
Finance Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf said the government would do everything in its power but its options were limited without the bill.
The protection of client information has helped to make Switzerland the world's biggest offshore financial centre, with $2 trillion in assets. But the haven has come under fire as other countries have tried to plug budget deficits by clamping down on tax evasion, with authorities investigating Swiss banks in Germany and France as well as the United States.
Experts were divided over the threat posed to Swiss banks by parliament's decision to oppose the law.
"The Americans will get the data they want. They will not stop until they have it," said Martin Naville, head of the Swiss-American Chamber of Commerce. "It is taxing the patience of our American friends. When their patience is over, there will be indictments, perhaps just one or two, but it will be more than enough to create chaos."
No one was immediately available for comment at the US Department of Justice.
Wegelin precedent
Earlier this year a U.S. indictment felled Switzerland's oldest private bank, Wegelin. It paid a $58m fine and closed its doors for good after pleading guilty to helping wealthy Americans evade taxes through secret accounts.
Shares in Basler Kantonalbank, one of the banks under US investigation seen at immediate risk, closed down 2.5%, compared with broadly positive Swiss stocks.
But Peter V. Kunz, professor for business law at Berne University, was more sanguine.
"I think bankers will be indicted, but I don't really see banks getting indicted... as there may not be enough evidence to accuse them of systematically violating US law," he said.
"Wegelin was indicted and settled but in my view this was a singular case. I don't see it as a model case for Swiss banks."
The government's attempt to fast-track the legislation through parliament to meet a US ultimatum angered many lawmakers in the fiercely independent country.
Right-wing lawmakers opposed the bill on the grounds that it could set a precedent that might prompt other countries to seek concessions from Switzerland. The centre-left also rejected it for different reasons, believing Swiss banks should be forced to face the music for aiding tax evasion.
Lawmakers from both the lower and upper house endorsed a statement saying they supported a solution to the long-running tax dispute despite the defeat, and called on the government to allow banks to cooperate under existing laws.
Protracted negotiations
Switzerland's biggest bank, UBS, was forced to pay a $780m fine in 2009 and deliver the names of more than 4,000 clients to avoid indictment, giving the US authorities information that allowed them to pursue other banks.
Since then, the government has tried to reach a settlement for the whole financial industry, but has been hamstrung by Swiss secrecy laws and bickering among banks over who should pay the heavy fines.
US authorities have more than a dozen banks under formal investigation, including Credit Suisse, Julius Baer, the Swiss arm of Britain's HSBC, privately held Pictet in Geneva and local government-backed Zuercher Kantonalbank and Basler Kantonalbank.

UK backs jail time for reckless bankers


Bankers who are reckless with customers' or taxpayers' money could face criminal charges and have bonuses and pensions clawed back, according to proposals backed by Britain's prime minister on Wednesday.
Many Britons blame bankers' risk-taking for the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent economic slump and were furious when the former boss of RBS left the bank with a pension of almost £17m even after a state rescue.
He later agreed to a cut and was stripped of his knighthood but it was one in a series of banking scandals that increased pressure on Prime Minister David Cameron to get tougher on a sector contributing billions of pounds to the British economy.
The parliamentary commission on banking standards he set up last year after Barclays was fined for manipulating interest rate benchmarks said on Wednesday the law should be changed so that bankers found guilty of "reckless misconduct in the management of a bank" could face jail.
The UK Treasury said the new rules could be in place before the end of 2015 but lawyers said it would be hard to prove when a banker had taken too much risk or simply made a mistake.
Asked in parliament whether he supported the report's recommendations on criminal penalties and pay, Cameron said: "Penalising, including criminal penalties ... bankers who behave irresponsibly, I say yes."
Lawyers doubted that new laws would be effective.
"There is likely to be a considerable burden of proof - merely miscalculating or being negligent in an assessment of risk most likely won't be enough," said Michael Isaacs, head of banking litigation at law firm Pinsent Masons.
The commission also recommended a new pay code to better balance risk and reward, with bonuses deferred for up to ten years with the aim of preventing bankers taking risks for short term reward, one of the factors blamed for the crisis.
It also proposed that the UK financial regulator would be granted a new power enabling it to cancel all bonuses and pension rights not yet paid out to senior executives in the event of their banks needing taxpayer support.
Watered down
Banking industry sources said banks were likely to accept many of the proposals in principle, including the threat of criminal sanctions, but will lobby for some to be watered down, including the 10-year deferral on bonuses.
"The commission's conclusions contain many constructive proposals to help fix the issues which have afflicted the industry, most importantly in the emphasis on personal responsibility and accountability," said HSBC Chairman Douglas Flint.
The cross-party commission, which includes former British finance minister Nigel Lawson and Justin Welby, head of the Anglican church, recommended senior bankers are held personally responsible and regulators granted greater powers.
Commission member Pat McFadden said it would be "pressing the government very hard in the coming weeks" to make sure the proposals are implemented. The government has set itself a four week deadline to give a formal response.
"I think all of us who were engaged in this process over the last year very much hope this is not a report which is going to gather dust," he told Reuters.
The British Bankers Association, a lobby group, said it would work with government and regulators to take forward proposals from what it described as the "most significant report into banking for a generation".
Unpopular
Bankers are deeply unpopular in Britain where the economy has narrowly avoided a triple-dip recession and is expected to show tepid growth at best through next year.
"I think jail sentences would be suitable," Ben Stewart, a 34-year-old cabinet maker said in Whitechapel, not far from the City of London, the traditional financial heartland.
"It's fraud a lot of what they've done. Even if it's not legally fraud, I think by most people's moral compass, they'd find it quite distasteful."
The commission recommended the industry adopt two new registers for senior bankers and other employees to make sure the most important responsibilities within banks were assigned to specific individuals.
The 'Senior Persons Regime' would enable those responsible for failures to be identified more easily and provide a stronger basis for action to be taken against them, the report said.
The Financial Conduct Authority, the financial services industry watchdog which took over regulation of banks in April, said it was "learning from the regulatory mistakes of the past".
The commission also urged the government to immediately consider a range of strategies for RBS, which is 81% state-owned, including a possible break-up.
Some commission members, including Lawson, have advocated hiving off RBS's toxic loans into a 'bad bank' leaving the remaining 'good bank' better able to lend to British businesses and households. But Finance Minister George Osborne said such a move would be complicated, time consuming and costly.
The report said the government had interfered in the running of RBS and Lloyds Banking Group, in which it holds a 39% stake, and said RBS was being held back by having the government as its main shareholder.
The level of the government's influence over RBS has come under scrutiny since chief executive Stephen Hester was ousted last week with the Treasury's approval.
Osborne is set to lay out strategies for returning RBS and Lloyds Banking Group to full private ownership in his annual speech to financiers in the City of London on Wednesday.

Big expectations for Obama Berlin speech


Five years and 50 years. As President Barack Obama revisits Berlin, he can't escape those anniversaries and the inevitable comparisons to history and personal achievement.

His 26-hour whirlwind visit to the German capital caps three days of international summitry for the president and marks his return to a place where he once summoned a throng of 200 000 to share his ambitious vision for American leadership.

That was 2008, when Obama was running for president and those who supported him at home and abroad saw the young mixed-race American as a unifying and transformational figure who signified hope and change.

Five years later, Obama comes to deliver a highly anticipated speech to a country that's a bit more sober about his aspirations and the extent of his successes, yet still eager to receive his attention at a time that many here feel that Europe, and Germany in particular, are no longer US priorities. A Pew Research Centre poll of Germans found that while their views of the US have slipped since Obama's first year in office, he has managed to retain his popularity, with 88% of those surveyed approving of his foreign policies.

Obama also has an arc of history to fulfil.

Fifty years ago next week, President John F Kennedy addressed a crowd of
450 000 in that then-divided city to denounce the Soviet bloc and famously declare "Ich bin ein Berliner", German for "I am a Berliner". Since then, presidents from Ronald Reagan to Bill Clinton have used Berlin speeches to articulate broad themes about freedom and international alliances.

Need for activism

Obama, fresh from a two-day summit of the Group of Eight industrial economies, will speak at the
Brandenburg Gate, a symbol of Germany's division and later reunification. It is a venue that German Chancellor Angela Merkel denied him in 2008, saying only sitting presidents were granted such an honour.

The past context and the weight of it are not lost on the White House.

"This is a place where US presidents have gone to talk about the role of the free world essentially," said Obama's deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes. "He is seeking to summon the energy and legacy of what's been done in the past and apply it to the issues that we face today."

Rhodes said Obama will make the case that even though the Berlin Wall came down 23 years ago and the threat of nuclear war has dissipated, the type of activism apparent during the Cold War needs to be applied to such current challenges as climate change, counterterrorism and the push for democratic values beyond the United States and Europe.

A senior administration official said Obama will also renew his call to reduce the world's nuclear stockpiles, including a proposed one-third reduction in US and Russian arsenals. He is not expected to outline a timeline for this renewed push. The official insisted on anonymity in order to preview the issue before the president's speech.

Obama will also hold a joint news conference with Merkel.

Merkel surprised by scope of spying

The visit was attracting widespread attention in
Germany. People waved and snapped photos as Obama sped by after his arrival and a thick cluster awaited the motorcade as it passed the Brandenburg Gate. An evening news show in Berlin devoted itself to the president's visit, highlighting "Das Biest", or "The Beast", as the president's armoured limousine is called.

There have been a few small protests, including one directed against the National Security Agency's surveillance of foreign communications, where about 50 people waved placards taunting, "Yes, we scan."

Merkel has said she was surprised at the scope of the spying that was revealed and said the
US must clarify what information is monitored. But she also said US intelligence was key to foiling a large-scale terror plot and acknowledged her country is "dependent" on co-operating with American spy services.

For Merkel, the visit presents an opportunity to bolster her domestic standing ahead of a general election in September.

The
US and the Germans have clashed on economic issues, with Obama pressing for Europe to prime the economy with government stimulus measures, while Merkel has insisted on pressing debt-ridden countries to stabilise their fiscal situations first.

But the two sides have found common ground on a trans-Atlantic trade pact between the European Union and the
US At the just-completed G8 summit, the leaders agreed to hold the first talks next month in the US.

Obama calls for nuclear reductions


Issuing an appeal for a new citizen activism in the free world, President Barack Obama renewed his call on Wednesday to reduce US and Russian nuclear stockpiles and to confront climate change, a danger he called "the global threat of our time."
In a wide-ranging speech that enumerates a litany of challenges facing the world, Obama said he wanted to reignite the spirit that Berlin displayed when it fought to reunite itself during the Cold War.
"Today's threats are not as stark as they were half a century ago, but the struggle for freedom and security and human dignity, that struggle goes on," Obama said at the city's historic Brandenburg Gate before a crowd of 6 000 invited guests under a bright, hot sun.
"And I come here for this city of hope because the test of our time demands the same fighting spirit that defined Berlin a half-century ago."
He called for a one-third reduction of US and Russian nuclear stockpiles, saying it is possible to ensure American security and a strong deterrent while also limiting nuclear weapons.
Obama's address, delivered from behind bullet-proof glass, comes nearly 50 years after John F Kennedy's famous Cold War speech in this once-divided city.
The president has previously called for reductions to nuclear stockpiles. But by addressing the issue in a major foreign policy speech, Obama signalled a desire to rekindle an issue that was a centrepiece of his early first-term national security agenda.
The president discussed non-proliferation with Russian President Vladimir Putin when they met on Monday on the sidelines of the Group of 8 summit in Northern Ireland. During Obama's first term, the US and Russia agreed to limit their stockpiles to 1 550 as part of the New START Treaty.
In Moscow, Russian foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov said that plans for any further arms reduction would have to involve countries beyond Russia and the United States.
"The situation is now far from what it was in the '60s and '70s, when only the USA and the Soviet Union discussed arms reduction," Ushakov said.
Withdrawal
Obama's calls for co-operation with Moscow come at a time of tension between the US and Russia, which are supporting opposite sides in Syria's civil war. Russia also remains wary of US missile defence plans in Europe, despite US assurances that the shield is not aimed at Moscow.
Germany's foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, is a strong advocate of nuclear disarmament and has long called for the removal of the last US nuclear weapons from German territory, a legacy of the Cold War.
The Buechel Air Base in western Germany is one of a few remaining sites in Europe where they are based.
Under an agreement drawn up when they formed a coalition government in 2009, Merkel's conservatives and Westerwelle's Free Democratic Party agreed to press Nato and Washington for the nuclear weapons to be withdrawn, but did not set any time frame.
Nuclear stockpile numbers are closely guarded secrets in most nations that possess them, but private nuclear policy experts say no countries other than the US and Russia are thought to have more than 300.
The Federation of American Scientists estimates that France has about 300, China about 240, Britain about 225, and Israel, India and Pakistan roughly 100 each.

Obama defends terrorism tactics in Berlin


President Barack Obama defended US intelligence methods on a visit to Berlin on Wednesday, telling Chancellor Angela Merkel and wary Germans that Washington was not monitoring the e-mails of ordinary citizens or damaging civil liberties.

Obama is popular in Germany but revelations before the trip that the United States has a covert internet surveillance programme, codenamed Prism, have caused outrage in a country where memories of the eavesdropping East German Stasi secret police are still fresh.

Merkel said at a joint news conference that also touched on Afghanistan, Syria and the global economy, that the two leaders had held "long and intensive" talks on the spying issue, and pointed out that some questions still need to be cleared up.

"This is not a situation in which we are rifling through the ordinary e-mails of German citizens or American citizens or French citizens or anybody else," said Obama, on his first visit to the German capital as president.

"This is not a situation where we simply go into the internet and start searching any way we want. This is a circumscribed system directed at us being able to protect our people and all of it is done under the oversight of the courts."

Obama was later due to speak to a crowd of roughly 4 000 invited guests at the Brandenburg Gate, which used to stand alongside the Berlin Wall dividing communist East Berlin from the capitalist West of the city.

Tension in
Afghanistan

His visit comes on the 50th anniversary of John F Kennedy's famous Ich bin ein Berliner speech. Seizing on the Cold War theme, Obama is expected to announce plans to sharply reduce nuclear arms stockpiles, an initiative he kicked off with a speech in
Prague in 2009 but which involves complex negotiations with Russia.

At the news conference, he touched on tensions with Afghan President Hamid Karzai over US plans to begin talks with the Taliban to try to seek a negotiated peace after 12 years of war, acknowledging "huge mistrust" between the Western-backed government in
Kabul and its arch-foes.

"We do think that ultimately we're going to need to see Afghans talking to Afghans about how they can move forward and end the cycle of violence there so they can start actually building their country," Obama said.

As a sign of displeasure with the
US move, Karzai has suspended talks with Washington on a troop agreement. But Obama said he welcomed Karzai's announcement that Afghan forces would soon take responsibility for security from the US-led Nato peacekeeping force.

On
Syria, Obama said reports that the United States was ready to "go all in" to war in the country were exaggerated. He reiterated his view that President Bashar Assad's government had used chemical weapons, while acknowledging that Russia was sceptical on this point.

For her part, Merkel said
Germany would not deliver weapons to the rebels, even though a European Union arms embargo on Syria has lapsed.

Pragmatic relationship


Obama arrived in
Germany from a two-day summit with Group of Eight leaders in Northern Ireland where he and other leaders clashed with Russian President Vladimir Putin over Syria.

He last came to
Berlin in 2008, during his first campaign for the presidency. Back then, Merkel refused to allow him to speak at the Brandenburg Gate. Instead he spoke down the road in Berlin's Tiergarten park, attracting a crowd of 200 000 - largely enthusiastic admirers.

The Democrat has forged a pragmatic - if not warm - relationship with the conservative Merkel, who is hoping to get a boost out of the visit months before a German election.

In a message which seemed designed for her domestic audience, she told Obama at the news conference that balance was essential in government monitoring of Internet communications.

"I made clear that although we do see the need for gathering information, the topic of proportionality is always an important one and the free democratic order is based on people feeling safe," said Merkel, who grew up in the communist East and experienced the Stasi first hand.

Obama said the US had thwarted at least 50 threats because of its monitoring programme, including planned attacks in
Germany.

Reassurance on drones


"So lives have been saved and the encroachment on privacy has been strictly limited," he said.

A poll last week showed 82% of Germans approve of Obama, but the magic of 2008, when he was feted like a rock star, has faded amid concerns about his tactics in combating terrorism.

In a nod to the criticism, Obama defended his failure to close the
Guantanamo Bay prison on Cuba that his predecessor George W Bush opened after the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, shortly after the 11 September attacks in New York and Washington.

He also reassured Germans that the
US military was not using German bases to launch unmanned drone attacks.

For Obama, who grew up in
Hawaii and spent part of his childhood in Indonesia, Europe has sometimes seemed an after-thought. The signature foreign policy initiative of his first term was his "pivot" to Asia.

But analysts say plans to create a free-trade zone between the
United States and European Union are a sign that he is repositioning policy to focus on Europe.

Enduring bonds


"The Obama administration has found it harder than expected to work with emerging powers and has fallen back to a more traditional reliance on European allies," said Charles Kupchan, professor of international affairs at
Georgetown University.

"
Washington doesn't have better options. And when it comes to who to engage in Europe, Germany grows stronger and stronger."

Obama spoke of "enduring bonds based on common values" that linked the
United States to Europe.

Peacekeeping: Ban warns of new threats


UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Wednesday the world body's peacekeeping efforts face growing dangers from non-traditional threats such as suicide bombers and improvised explosive devices.

Ban told reporters on a visit to a peacekeeping training base near the Chinese capital that the UN must ensure that peacekeepers have the necessary training and specialised skills to face the threats.

These threats "are not new to the UN, but they are more intense," Ban said.

Ban's comments came at the start of a three-day visit to
China to meet with newly appointed President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang. Their discussions are expected to include China's growing involvement in UN affairs, along with international topics including tensions on the Korean Peninsula.

He said peacekeepers need to react rapidly and gather and analyze information on remote areas. In order to ensure that capability, the UN is deploying drones for the first time to its mission in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ban said.

Ban also praised
China's commitment to peacekeeping efforts. China has dispatched 22 000 troops to 23 missions, more than the other four permanent members of the UN Security Council combined.

"I applaud this solidarity," Ban said, noting 14 Chinese peacekeepers have died while serving.

Threatened

In all, nearly 3 000 peacekeepers have died in the line of duty since the first were deployed 65 years ago - 103 of them last year in Congo, Darfur, Sudan, Ivory Coast and other countries. Eight more civilian contractors, such as pilots, also died during deployment with peacekeeping missions in 2012.

The United Nations currently has more than 113 000 personnel serving in 16 UN peacekeeping and political missions.

In the latest crisis to hit peacekeeping efforts,
Austria announced it would pull out its 377 peacekeepers from the 911-member UN force in the Golan Heights after fighting from the Syrian civil war threatened their positions earlier this month.

That will leave just 341 Philippine soldiers and 193 from
India in the strategic area along the border with Israel.

Philippine Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario told reporters on Wednesday that his country will keep its peacekeepers in place at least until 3 August. It will then consider a request from Ban to stay on, del Rosario said.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

NEWS,20.11.2012




Seven And A Half Things To Know: Fiscal Cliff Spurs Super-Rich Panic


Thing One: Super-Rich Super Panic: Rich Americans likely have the most on the line as we near the fiscal cliff, the New York Times notes. Their tax rates would rise under the President's plan or if lawmakers don’t reach a deal. Some are taking action in advance. The Walton family, which founded Walmart, may save as much $180 million in taxes thanks to the company’s decision to push up its dividend payout to December from January so investors can count the income for this year, according to The New York Times. If Obama and Congress fail to reach a deal this year the tax rate on dividend income could more than double. But as The NYT notes in a separate article, under Obama’s plan, rich is defined rather broadly. It could mean the super-wealthy Waltons or an individual or small business owner making more than $200,000 per year.Meanwhile, corporations also stand to lose: More than $150 billion over 10 years in tax breaks, according to the Financial Times. Some business leaders say they would graciously agree to help America by giving up their corporate tax breaks so as long as they come with more complete corporate tax reform next year. Still, it’s likely what business leaders want the most is for lawmakers to reach a solution. Stock indexes rose to their best day in two months on Monday on optimism that lawmakers would agree to a deal, according to the Wall Street Journal. There’s at least one CEO out there claims he’s willing to give up tax breaks for a solution, NASDAQ head Robert Greifeld said politicians need to worry less about “winning” and admitted that “broadening the tax base” may be necessary to get the necessary deal done. Thing Two: Walmart's Thanksgiving May Be Ruined: As Walmart’s founders are looking for ways to skirt higher taxes, some of their employees are protesting the company’s decision to make them work on Thanksgiving. More than 30,000 people have already signed an online petition protesting the company’s decision to open on Thanksgiving Day. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that labor officials are trying to decide as soon as possible whether to seek an injunction on behalf of Walmart to stop planned protests at 1,000 of its store locations on Black Friday, the biggest shopping day of the year. Walmart claims the protests are an illegal disruption of business. Thing Three: The Twinkie Is Saved: Twinkie enthusiasts calm down, you’ll still be able to relive the tasteless 1950s as often as you’d like. Hostess Brands, the makers of Twinkies, agreed to mediation, with the Bakers Union, the group the company claimed was forcing them to liquidate. But don’t stop hoarding Cup Cakes and Ding Dongs just yet, the company isn’t positive it will reach a solution, a Hostess spokesman told the Financial Times. The two sides will meet with the bankruptcy judge that ordered the mediation Tuesday in an aim to reach a new contract and save 18,500 jobs, according to the Wall Street Journal. If they can’t reach a deal, Hostess will be able to move forward with its plans to liquidate.Thing Four: Eurozone Crisis Still Not Over: The European crisis rages on and yes, leaders are still fighting about what exactly to do. European finance ministers are racing to find a fix after deciding last week to give Greece two extra years to cut its budget deficit creating a $19 billion hole in the country’s finances and angering the IMF, according to Bloomberg. Meanwhile, France, one of the region’s stronger economies isn’t faring too well. Moody’s cut the country’s credit rating and slammed President Fancois Hollande’s attempts to fix the economy, according to the Wall Street Journal.Thing Five: Ex-Trader Found Guilty Of Losing Lots Of Money: In the continuing saga of finding others to blame for banks’ risky behavior, ex-UBS trader Kweku Adoboli was convicted of one count of fraud for losing the bank $2.3 billion, according to Reuters. In defending himself Adoboli had said that his managers encouraged him to push the risk limits, adding that his huge loss came “in pursuit of the goals set by our leadership.”Thing Six: Credit Suisse 2.0: Apparently when one of your rivals cuts 10,000 jobs it makes you consider a few things. Credit Suisse is splitting off its investment bank unit outside Switzerland from its global wealth bank, Swiss investment banking and wealth management units in an aim to meet the “new regulatory reality,” according to the Financial Times. The move comes just a few weeks after rival UBS slashed 10,000 jobs in its investment banking unit. The move will likely keep the bank less vulnerable to the whims of international markets and corporate finance. The bank might also get another thing added to its plate soon. The New York Attorney General’s office is planning to file a lawsuit against Credit Suisse, alleging that the bank misled investors on the quality of its mortgage-backed securities in the lead up to the financial crisis, according to Reuters. Thing Seven: People Still Don't Like PCs: The death of the PC claims another victim. Intel CEO Paul Otellini announced yesterday that he’s stepping down from his post early after not successfully shifting the chipmaker from a PC-based business to a mobile business, according to Bloomberg. The unexpected announcement may indicate the depth of the company’s woes, Intel is typically known for careful succession planning and Otellini could have stayed on for another three years, according to the Financial Times.Thing Seven And A Half: Your Favorite Thanksgiving Moments Revealed: Just two more days for Thanksgiving and the best holiday of the year can’t come soon enough. Here are the 15 best moments of Thanksgiving (many in gif form) via Buzzfeed to get you through these last 48 hours of work.

 

China escalates subsidies spat with US


China is to ask the World Trade Organisation to rule on its latest commercial spat with the United States, the WTO said on Tuesday, hoping it will back Beijing's complaint that punitive US tariffs imposed on a raft of Chinese goods are illegal.In a move that deepened the dispute, China will ask the WTO to set up a three-person dispute panel at a meeting on Nov. 30. If China wins the case and any subsequent appeal Washington could be forced to drop the tariffs it levied on 31 Chinese products which it said were being traded unfairly.The US tariffs affected photovoltaic cells and modules used in solar power, various steel products, off-road tyres, aluminium goods as well as towers for windfarms.Such capital-intensive and cyclical commodity products have frequently been at the centre of trade disputes as national industries have asked governments to step in and stop foreign competition from destroying profits and jobs.Steel products have frequently been involved, as more recently have solar power components, with the oversupplied global solar industry struggling to maintain its profit margins.The United States has been a fierce critic of what it says are clandestine Chinese subsidy programmes, but Beijing says Washington's efforts to tackle suspected wrongdoing have gone beyond the rules.China's complaint targets Public Law 112-99, which was signed by President Barack Obama in March, as well as US steps taken against suspected export-distorting subsidies between Nov. 20 2006 and the passage of the contested law.In a WTO filing, China said the US law had broken the rules because it applied retroactively to suspected Chinese subsidies as far back as 2006.The United States was also at fault, China said, because it used "double remedies" against China between 2006 and March this year.Double remedies means targeting the same Chinese exports twice over - once for being subsidised and once for being "dumped", or sold at unfairly cheap prices.China launched the complaint in September, just hours after the United States lodged a similar complaint against China's support for car exports.Under WTO rules a country accused of breaking the rules has 60 days to try to resolve the complaint, after which the complainant can ask the WTO to set up a panel of adjudicators to judge the merits of the dispute. The WTO's ruling is likely to be made public in mid-2013.



Watchdog investigates lending practices


Britain's consumer watchdog has launched investigations into several payday lenders over aggressive debt collection and expressed its concern about general poor practice within the sector.Payday lenders offer short-term loans, which are intended to be paid back when borrowers receive their wages. Britons have increasingly turned to these loans as mainstream banks have tightened their criteria for granting short-term credit."We have uncovered evidence that some payday lenders are acting in ways that are so serious that we have already opened formal investigations against them," David Fisher, the Office of Fair Trading's (OFT) director of consumer credit, said on Tuesday."It is also clear that, across the sector, lenders need to improve their business practices or risk enforcement action."The OFT identified issues around debt-collection practices, the adequacy of affordability checks made by lenders, the number of loans not repaid on time and the lack of forbearance shown by some lenders when borrowers get into financial difficulties.Wonga.com, which offers individuals short-term loans of up to 1 000 pounds, more than trebled its earnings last year. Like other payday lenders, the company has faced criticism that its annual percentage rate (APR), listed on Wonga.com as 4 214%, takes advantage of the financially vulnerable.The OFT is reviewing the whole sector and has said that some firms will face enforcement action if they do not improve their practices.Wonga said that it welcomed the OFT's review. "We provide a valued, transparent service to more than a million customers and want to see rogue practices rooted out across all financial services," it said.The OFT will publish a full report next year and state whether wider action is needed to tackle problems in the sector.

Monday, September 17, 2012

NEWS,17.09.2012



Billionaires score over millionaires


Many millionaires got poorer in the last year, but billionaires did just fine, using their heavyweight money management teams to ride out market and economic turmoil that hit the lesser rich, research company Wealth-X said on Monday.The ranks of people with at least $30m edged up to 187 380 but their total wealth fell 1.8% to $25.8 trillion - still a sum bigger than the combined size of the US and Chinese economies, Wealth-X said in a report.Hardest hit globally were those in the $200m to $499m range, whose numbers dropped 9.9% and whose fortunes shrank 11.4%, the World Ultra Wealth Report said, using data for the year through July 31.But the really, really rich got even richer as the number of billionaires rose 9.4% to 2 160 people and their wealth grew 14% to $6.2 trillion."Even at a billion or two billion, they have a much larger entourage, they have much more in the way of investment advice. They certainly get the attention of every major bank," Mykolas Rambus, Wealth-X's chief executive officer, told Reuters. "This was the issue about that mid tier, the $100m to $500m risk land. I don't think it appears these guys employ enough talent to help their own portfolios plus their holding companies to be successful."As Europe struggles and the US economy recovers fitfully, the affluent are shifting away from speculative investments into private companies, commodities and property, said Wealth-X, a Singapore-based firm that provides intelligence on the ultra-rich to banks, fundraisers and luxury retailers.Asia suffered the worst regional loss of wealth, with a fall of 6.8% to $6.25 trillion due to weaker equity markets and lower export demand from the West, it said.While wealth also shrank in Europe, Latin America and the Middle East, the rich saw their fortunes grow in North America (up 2.8% to $8.88 trillion) and Oceania (up 4.4% to $475bn) - much of that in Australia.But Asia's rich cannot be discounted, Wealth-X said, as the fall in wealth in Japan, China and India - home to 75% of ultra high net worth (UHNW) Asians - will reverse, based on the strength of the region's financial systems and economies."Total Asian UHNW wealth is forecast to surpass the US combined wealth by 2020," it said.

Private banks target the super rich

 

What do you get the client who has everything? An evening at a sleep school to get tips on how to beat insomnia? A chance to play cricket with former England star Andrew Flintoff? Advice on finding the right school?These are just some of the services offered by Barclays in its "Little Book of Wonders," underscoring the lengths to which the bank is prepared to go to win the custom of the super-wealthy at a time when its traditional businesses are struggling with weak economies and tougher regulators."There is more to wealth than managing one's assets," said David Hughes, Head of Affinity Partnerships at Barclays, which oversees the Little Book of Wonders. "This is a complement to the financial advice we give clients and a recognition of the world in which our clients exist."Attracting the business of wealthy clients, worth an estimated $42 trillion globally, is critical for banks seeking not only to maintain their profitability, but also to diversify their sources of funding and reduce their reliance on capital markets."Private banking, given the relatively lower capital requirements and the fee based nature of revenue is an area of growth and competition which is expected to increase," Jill Zucker, a partner at McKinsey's, told Reuters.Private clients pay on average 1 percent of assets under management in fees to their wealth managers each year, estimates specialist wealth management consultant Scorpio Partnership.Banks are keen to attract such fees as profits remain squeezed in other parts of their business, from high street lending to commercial and investment banking.For example, Barclays reported a 38 percent rise in adjusted pre-tax profit in its wealth and investment management division in the first 6 months of the year compared with a 15 percent rise in its retail and business banking and 11 percent rise in corporate and investment banking.Coutts, the 300-year old British bank which counts Britain's Queen Elizabeth among its clientele, is beefing up its non-financial services to hold onto elite customers.Ian Ewart, head of product, services & marketing, said the bank still loved to whisk away clients on horseracing jaunts and to a welter of events hosted in the social calendar of the glitterati - including the Cowes Quarter Ton sailing regatta and annual British Academy of Film and Television Arts awards bash.But as entrepreneur clients start to outnumber heirs and heiresses, who tend to have a different outlook, Coutts is spending more time, effort and money satisfying a thirst for intellectual "entertainment" and high-level networking in a business world where success increasingly depends as much on 'who you know' as 'what you know'.A new thought leadership series called Futurescope has been designed to help the bank's entrepreneurial customers analyse future macroeconomic issues and identify moneymaking opportunities in this decade and the next."Our clients can buy whatever they want for the most part. What they cannot buy - which is also what they really need - is to connect with people like them, to hear new ideas. The experience is far (more) important than a luxury freebie," he said.Tale of two millionaires But in expanding the breadth and depth of services offered, private banks will have to make sure the extra cost is worth their while as profit margins in wealth management buckle under the increasing cost of regulation, compliance and technology.The global wealth management industry is now paying $8 to generate every $10 of income, calculates Scorpio Partnership in its closely watched annual health check of the global private banking sector in July."The question of how you can continue to cater for clients that might be less profitable for you in the future is a difficult one," Coutts' Ewart said.In the case of its Little Book of Wonders, Barclays declined to disclose the cost of building and maintaining the online portal, saying it was part of its overall investment in its wealth management platform.In an attempt to offset the costs of providing the service, the bank has offered the luxury brands the opportunity to advertise, for a fee, on its Little Book of Wonders portal.Banks will pitch services such as Futurescope or the Little Book of Wonders to a select set of clients depending on their wealth and how they've made their money rather than offering blanket invites, to preserve the exclusivity of the offers.But as clients question the fees they pay, especially in an environment where investment assets are delivering lacklustre returns due to ongoing economic uncertainty, additional services not seen as essential to business needs might raise eyebrows."If there are fancy chandeliers and teacups, some clients might assume they are paying too much in fees," said Zucker.Such services are often tailored to the ultra high net worth individuals, with assets greater than $25 million, who are not only costing the banks more but are also not necessarily the most profitable.So-called 'Core Millionaires', with assets of between $1 million and $10 million, generate investment revenue margins on average two to three times higher than their wealthier counterparts, making greater use of more profitable banking and lending products, a survey by McKinsey estimates.These Core Millionaires are also projected to generate 60 percent of asset growth amongst all households with more than $1 million in assets by 2015."They're a bit of a lost set of clients," said Zucker. "Banks need to tailor their offering so there is growth in different market segments."So, where does this leave the Little Book of Wonders?A junior member of one of Britain's most successful entrepreneurial families, whose mother recently switched private banking allegiance, was sceptical that affluent individuals would be tempted to change banks based on free offers."Would clients be impressed by that? No way," said the family member, who declined to be named. "They just want to make sure that their banking is done, that their transfers happen, that they can speak to someone when they need to," he said.