NEWS,26.11.2012

Obama drafts Geithner to crack budget

US President Barack Obama has made Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner lead White House negotiator in budget talks with Congress aimed at averting the fiscal cliff, a report said Monday The Wall Street Journal said Geithner was viewed on Capitol Hill as a straight-shooter who had a better chance of brokering a deal than Jacob Lew, Obama's former budget chief who has burnt his bridges with some Republicans.If no deal is reached before the end of the year, a poison pill law of tax hikes and massive spending cuts, including slashes to the military, comes into effect with potentially catastrophic effects for the fragile US economy.The report said Geithner, who is preparing to leave his post as treasury secretary early in Obama's second term, has spent months already preparing for the fiscal talks, which will begin this week in earnest in Washington.Geithner will be joined by White House budget and tax experts, including Lew, now Obama's chief of staff, and National Economic Council Director Gene Sperling, the Wall Street Journal said.They will try to hammer out an elusive compromise with congressional aides but final decisions will be made by political leaders such as Obama and Republican House Speaker John Boehner, the report said.In recent days, several leading Republicans have indicated a willingness to accept a deal that includes more revenue from ending loopholes in the tax code in return for cuts in funding to Democrats' beloved welfare programs.Geithner, 51, is not affiliated with any party and has spent his career in government finance and on the political sidelines.He first joined the Treasury at age 27. When George W. Bush became president in 2001, he went to work for the Council on Foreign Relations and the International Monetary Fund.At 42, he was tapped to be head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, considered the Fed's second-most influential post because the New York bank interacts directly with a powerful constituency that includes Wall Street.Despite holding high office in the years leading up to the 2008 financial collapse, when regulatory authorities are accused of having been asleep at the wheel, he was tapped by Obama to lead the recovery.Upon assuming office in early 2009, he was charged with overseeing two major bailout packages worth more than $1.5 trillion and aimed at shoring up the country's distressed banking sector.The administration has said that the stimulus, while costly, averted another Great Depression, while conservative critics have branded it a costly expansion of government that has failed to revive the economy.

 

Medvedev does not rule out Kremlin return

Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said he is not ruling out a return to the Kremlin after his 2008-2012 single term as Russian head of state but was happy working as premier under his mentor Vladimir Putin."If I have sufficient strength and health, if our people trust me in the future with such a position, then of course I do not rule such a turn of events," Medvedev said in an interview with Agence France-Presse and Le Figaro when asked if he had the ambition for another Kremlin term.Medvedev, who on Monday embarks on a working visit to France, served as president after Putin stepped aside following the maximum two consecutive terms allowed by the constitution after his 2000-2008 stint.But Putin, aged 60, stayed on as a powerful prime minister and Medvedev, aged 47, never fully emerged from the shadow of his fellow Saint Petersburg native, an impression strongly reinforced when Putin returned to the Kremlin in May 2012.Medvedev, who in turn was then appointed prime minister in May, failed to bring about lasting change through a much-trumpeted modernisation programme in his one term as president.But in his interview with AFP, he revealed he had not lost his political ambition. "This returning to the presidency depends on a whole range of factors." "Never say never, especially as I swam in that river once and this is a river that you can swim in twice," he said.Russia will only go to the polls to vote for a president again in March 2018 and in the next half decade society is expected to see major change as the middle class grows and internet use explodes. Putin has also not ruled out standing again.This year's tightly choreographed job swap was criticised for being played out far from the public, and frustration over the return of Putin to the Kremlin fuelled the opposition protests that rocked Russia in the last year.Medvedev acknowledged the protests that began last December had shown a transformation in Russian society that the authorities could no longer ignore."Our society changed, it had become more active and the authorities needed to take account of this and react," said Medvedev, saying the government had done this by introducing electoral reform.Some of Medvedev's supporters who saw him as a possible champion of a refreshed, innovative and more pro-Western Russia were hugely disappointed by his apparent surrender of the Kremlin back to Putin.But Medvedev played up the tight links between the two men, saying he would find it impossible to work under anyone else."I would hardly have become prime minister under another president, I cannot imagine it at all," he said."If there is someone you can work with comfortably as prime minister after being president it is just one person, Vladimir Putin."However Medvedev has distanced himself from Putin on some issues, notably the case of feminist punk rockers Pussy Riot, two of whom have been sent to prison camps for performing a song against the Russian strongman in a church.Reaffirming his belief that they should be released, he said: "I think they have already tasted what prison is... So further punishment in the form of prison is not necessary. This is my personal position."On the case of Russia's best known prisoner, the former tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Medvedev said court decisions had to be respected but noted that the convict had never made a bid for clemency from the Kremlin.Medvedev admitted that his modernisation drive had so far fallen short but expressed hope there was still time to put his ideas into place."It's true that for the moment modernisation has not turned into a national idea and there has been no kind of radical progress reached."

 

Euro zone to seek Greek aid deal without write-off

Euro zone finance ministers and the International Monetary Fund made their third attempt in as many weeks to agree on releasing emergency aid for Greece today, with policymakers saying a write-down of Greek debt is off the table for now.Greek Finance Minister Yannis Stournaras said he was confident the ministers would reach a deal after Greece fulfilled its part of the deal by enacting tough austerity measures and economic reforms."I'm certain we will find a mutually beneficial solution today," he said on arrival for what was set to be another marathon meeting.Greece, where the euro zone's debt crisis erupted in late 2009, is the currency area's most heavily indebted country, despite a big "haircut" this year on privately-held bonds. Its economy has shrunk by nearly 25% in five years.EU Economic and Monetary Affairs Olli Rehn said it was vital to disburse the next 31 billion euro tranche of aid "to end the uncertainty that is still hanging over Greece". He urged all sides to "go the last centimetre because we are so close to an agreement".Negotiations have been stalled over how Greece's debt, forecast to peak at 190-200% of GDP in the coming two years, can be cut to a more sustainable 120% by 2020.Without agreement on how to reduce the debt, the IMF has held up payments to Athens because there is no guarantee of when the need for emergency financing will end.The key question is: Can Greek debt become sustainable without the euro zone writing off some of the loans to Athens?IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde said on arrival that the solution must be "credible for Greece".A source familiar with IMF thinking said the global lender was demanding immediate measures to cut Greece's debt by 20 percentage points of GDP, with a commitment to do more to reduce the debt stock in a few years if Greece fulfills its programme.Under the source's scenario, Greece's debt could be reduced to around 125% of GDP by 2020 using a variety of methods including a debt buyback, reducing the interest rate on loans and returning euro zone central bank 'profits' to Greece, but further steps would still be needed to hit the 120% goal.The ministers took an extended break in mid-afternoon while experts worked on how to formulate a link between short-term measures and a credible assurance of eventual debt relief.Germany and its northern European allies have so far rejected any idea of forgiving official loans to Athens.German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told reporters on arrival that a debt cut now was legally impossible, not just for Germany but for other euro zone countries, if it was linked to a new guarantee of loans."You cannot guarantee something if you're cutting debt at the same time," he said. That might not preclude debt relief at a later stage if Greece has completed its adjustment programme and no longer needs new loans.The source familiar with IMF thinking said a loan write-off once Greece has established a track record of compliance would be the simplest way to make its debt viable, but other methods such as foregoing interest payments, or lending at below market rates and extending maturities could all help.The German banking association (BDB) said a fresh "haircut" or forced reduction in the value of Greek sovereign debt, must only happen as a last resort.Two European Central Bank policymakers, vice-president Vitor Constancio and executive board member Joerg Asmussen, said debt forgiveness was not on the agenda for now.Asmussen told Germany's Bild newspaper the package of measures would include a substantial reduction of interest rates on loans to Greece and a debt buy-back by Greece, funded by loans from a euro zone rescue fund.So far, the options under consideration include reducing interest on already extended bilateral loans to Greece from the current 150 basis points above financing costs.How much lower is not yet decided - France and Italy would like to reduce the rate to 30 basis points (bps), while Germany and some other countries insist on a 90 bps margin.Another option, which could cut Greek debt by almost 17% of GDP, is to defer interest payments on loans to Greece from the EFSF, a temporary bailout fund, by 10 years.The European Central Bank could forego profits on its Greek bond portfolio, bought at a deep discount, cutting the debt pile by a further 4.6% by 2020, a document prepared for the ministers' talks last week showed.Not all euro zone central banks are willing to forego their profits, however, the German Bundesbank among them.Greece could also buy back its privately-held bonds on the market at a deep discount, with gains from the operation depending on the scope and price. Officials have spoken of a 10 billion euro buy-back at around 30 cents on the euro, that would retire around 30 billion euros of debt, although since the idea was raised the potential gain has fallen as prices have risen.But the preparatory document from last week said that the 120% target could not be reached in 2020, only two years later, unless ministers accept losses on their loans to Athens, provide additional financing or force private creditors into selling Greek debt at a discount.The latest analysis for the ministers showed the debt could come down to 125% of GDP in 2020, one euro zone official with insight into the talks said.

NEWS,11.04.2012.

North Korea starts fuelling long-range rocket

Impoverished North Korea rejected international protests over its planned long-range rocket launch and said today that it was injecting fuel "as we speak", meaning it could blast off as early as tomorrow.If all goes to plan, the launch, which North Korea's neighbours and the West say is a disguised ballistic missile test, will take a three-stage rocket over a sea separating the Korean peninsula from China before releasing a satellite into orbit when the third stage fires over waters near the Philippines.Regional powers also worry it could be the prelude to another nuclear test, a pattern the hermit state set in 2009."We don't really care about the opinions from the outside. This is critical in order to develop our national economy," said Paek Chang-ho, head of the satellite control centre at the Korean Committee of Space Technology.Once the refuelling has been completed, the North Koreans will have to inject chemicals into the rocket and these chemicals cause corrosion, which means the firing could come tomorrow, at the start of a five-day window announced already by Pyongyang.Weather conditions on the Korean peninsula also appear to favour a launch tomorrow or Saturday, according to meteorological reports from Japanese television."The likelihood of a launch (tomorrow) is the greatest," said Francis Yoon, a professor of engineering at South Korea's Yonsei University and an expert on rocket technology.The launch of the Unha-3 rocket, which North Korea says will merely put a weather satellite into space, breaches UN sanctions imposed to prevent Pyongyang from developing a missile that could carry a nuclear warhead.James Oberg, a former rocket scientist with the US space shuttle mission control who is in North Korea, said the rocket was not a weapon, but "98% of a weapon", requiring more technology, although not much.

 This is the third long-range rocket test by North Korea. It claims that its second succeeded in putting a satellite into orbit in 2009, although independent experts say it failed.The firing coincides with the 100th birthday celebrations of the founder of North Korea, Kim Il-sung, whose grandson, Kim Jong-un, now rules. Kim Il-sung died in 1994.It will also follow today's annual Workers' Party Congress which is expected to appoint Kim Jong-un as Secretary General of the Workers' Party of Korea, the top post held by his late father, Kim Jong-il.Paek, briefing foreign journalists in the North Korean capital of Pyongyang, declined to comment on the launch date."And as for the exact timing of the launch, it will be decided by my superiors", Paek said.South Korea, which remains technically at war with the North after their 1950-53 conflict ended with a truce rather than a peace treaty, warned Pyongyang it would deepen its isolation if it went ahead with the launch.Security sources in Seoul, citing satellite images, have said that North Korea, which walked out of "six-party" disarmament talks three years ago, is also preparing a third nuclear test following the launch, something it did in 2009 and a move bound to trigger further condemnation and isolation.South Korea holds parliamentary elections today, although the rocket does not appear to have been a major issue with voters more concerned about job security.US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that history pointed to "additional provocations" from North Korea after the launch, an apparent reference to a nuclear test."This launch will give credence to the view that North Korean leaders see improved relations with the outside world as a threat to their system," she told cadets at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland."And recent history strongly suggests that additional provocations may follow."She also called on China to do more to ensure regional stability.China, impoverished North Korea's only major ally, yesterday reiterated its pleas for calm and said it had "repeatedly expressed its concern and anxiety about the developments".

NEWS,25.03.2012.

US puts forward World Bank nominee

Jim Yong Kim, the US nominee to lead the World Bank, will win broad international support despite an unprecedented challenge by candidates from emerging economies, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said in an interview.Washington's hold on the World Bank presidency is being contested for the first time by candidates from emerging economies.Two respected economists and diplomats, Nigerian Finance Minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and former Colombian finance minister Jose Antonio Ocampo, have been nominated.Kim, a Korean-American health expert, is well known among development experts for his work in fighting HIV/AIDS and bringing healthcare to the poor.President Barack Obama nominated him for World Bank president over the weekend.."The president was looking for a candidate who could command broad support across the world," said Geithner."That's very important, because we don't make this decision alone.""Dr. Kim's mix of skills will be particularly compelling to the bank at this time and I think the world will be very impressed with him," he said.Emerging economies such as China, India, South Africa, Brazil and Russia have sought to use their growing economic clout to pry open the selection process for the heads of the World Bank and its sister organization, the International Monetary Fund.The World Bank has always been headed by an American and the IMF by a European since their inception after World War Two.Geithner said it was not a surprise that candidates from other countries had been nominated after a 2009 agreement by leaders of the Group of 20 nations for an open and transparent process to select leaders of the two institutions."We expected that to happen and think it is healthy for the institution as a whole," Geithner said. "But I can tell you from my conversations with developing and developed countries, I am confident he (Kim) will win broad support."US officials have acknowledged that giving up the World Bank presidency would make it difficult for the White House to obtain funding from Congress for the global lender, especially with lawmakers worried about mounting budget deficits.The United States has also argued that it does not head any other global organization.After a broad search that looked at US bankers, economists and politicians, Obama settled on Kim because the Dartmouth College president has a deep commitment to development issues, Geithner said.In particular, he cited Kim's experience in programs to fight HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis in impoverished nations, which he said demonstrated that the nominee could get things done in tough environments.In coming weeks, Kim will visit nations in Africa, Asia and Latin America to try to convince them he is the best candidate to lead the poverty-fighting institution, US officials said.Kim was recommended to Obama by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, officials said. Kim and his long-time collaborator Paul Farmer worked with former President Clinton on reconstruction efforts in Haiti following a devastating earthquake in 2010.The White House has acknowledged it considered candidates tied more closely to Washington political circles, including US Senator John Kerry, US Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice and former White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers."The president wanted somebody who had defined their life through a commitment to the cause of development but had also demonstrated an ability to solve complex problems in a creative way," said Geithner, a Dartmouth alumnus who played a lead role in the search for a successor for outgoing World Bank President Robert Zoellick.Kim's development successes involving HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and the provision of inexpensive medicine to the poor have received wide praise. However, some development experts say he lacks the economic credentials and diplomatic skills of rival nominees Okonjo-Iweala and Ocampo.While the World Bank's mission remains focused on eradicating poverty, the rise of some once poorer clients such as China and India have forced it to also focus on impediments to development in emerging economies, including power supply and governance issues.Okonjo-Iweala and Ocampo would bring more expertise in these areas, some development economists say.A senior Obama administration official said the bank has ample expertise and what is needed at the top is someone who can get things done.The World Bank is involved in the design of health systems in developing countries, but its funding and influence in the area has been eclipsed by groups such as the Geneva-based Global Fund and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.Geithner said Kim has "an incredible feel for what matters most in development and recognizes that for economies to grow they have to invest in expanding opportunities for their people, in healthcare and in education.""Those are lessons that the most successful emerging and developing countries have learned and been forced to learn, and in that sense he has the ideal feel," Geithner added. "His experience comes from what he has done in the field, not just from his academic research."People who had worked with Kim were impressed by his ability to handle complicated situations in tough environments such as Haiti, Geithner said. In Haiti, Kim was credited with persuading the government to take steps to avoid an outbreak of tuberculosis.

NEWS,18.03.2012.

US: North Korean satellite launch would be "deal-breaker"

North Korea's announcement Friday of plans to launch an observation satellite in April brought condemnation from the United States, South Korea, Japan and the United Nations due to concerns that the launch could be used to test ballistic missile technology. US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Washington now had 'grave concerns' about the February 29 agreement in which North Korea agreed to a moratorium on its nuclear and long-range missile programmes and international nuclear inspections, in exchange for 240,000 metric tons of food aid from the United States. 'We made clear unequivocally that we considered that any satellite launch would be a deal-breaker,' she said Friday. The Kwangmyongsong-3, borne by the Unha-3 carrier rocket, was to be launched between April 12-16 to mark the centenary of the birth of North Korea's founder, Kim Il Sung, who was born on April 15. Nuland said that a launch would be 'highly provocative' and in violation of United Nations Security Council resolutions 1718 and 1874, which banned launches using ballistic missile technology. The February 29 agreement had raised hopes that the six-party talks on Pyongyang's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes - including North and South Korea, the United States, Japan, China and Russia - could be resumed. Nuland said that US officials consulted Friday with other participants, and all were 'caught by some surprise' by North Korea's satellite announcement. 'Now, the question is for all of the six-party members to make clear that this is not the way to go forward if (the North Koreans) want to work with us,' she said. Nuland said that a North Korean launch would create 'tensions,' making 'implementation of any kind of a nutritional agreement quite difficult.' The South Korean Foreign Ministry expressed 'grave concern' over the planned launch, which it said would be a 'clear violation' of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1874, which bans 'any launch using ballistic missile technology.' Seoul said it would 'closely cooperate' with the other members of the six-party talks 'so that North Korea ceases such a provocative action.' In Tokyo, chief cabinet secretary Osamu Fujimura said: 'Japan will strongly urge North Korea not to go ahead with the launch.' The possible satellite launch 'undermines the efforts to settle various issues, which have been made through talks' with North Korea, Fujimura said. A spokesman for the North Korean Committee for Space Technology was quoted by Pyongyang's official news agency KCNA as saying the move would 'offer an important occasion of putting the country's technology of space use for peaceful purposes on a higher stage.' The 'polar-orbiting, Earth-observation satellite will be blasted off southward' from the Sohae Satellite Launching Station in the eastern province of North Pyongan, which lies on the Chinese border and Yellow Sea, the spokesman said. Pyongyang denied any military aspect to the launch. 'The DPRK will strictly abide by relevant international regulations and usage concerning the launch of scientific and technological satellites for peaceful purposes,' the spokesman said. Previous launches of multi-stage rockets by North Korea in 1998 and 2009, which Pyongyang said aimed to put satellites into orbit, were condemned by the US, South Korea and Japan as potential tests of military ballistic technology. The deal, under which Pyongyang was also to stop the enrichment of uranium at a major nuclear facility and permit visits by nuclear inspectors, had raised hopes of a possible resumption of six-nation talks on North Korea's nuclear weapons programme, which have been stalled since late 2008. The talks reached an agreement in 2005 in which North Korea was to dismantle its nuclear programme, but the reclusive communist state has since carried out two nuclear tests in addition to the long-range missile launches. The UN Security Council passed Resolution 1874 in June 2009 in response to the tests. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon urged Pyongyang 'to reconsider its decision in line with its recent undertaking to refrain from long-range missile launches.' He sai a launch would be a violation of the UN resolutions.

NEWS,12.01.2012.

Iran urges UN to condemn nuclear scientists’ killings

 
Iran has issued an impassioned letter to the United Nations Secretary General charging that the killings of Iranian nuclear scientists were terror attacks that followed a clear pattern — an assertion the country’s ambassador to the United Nations repeated to CNN in an interview Wednesday night.“There is firm evidence that certain foreign quarters are behind such assassinations,” the letter said, “It is highly expected from the Secretary-General of the United Nations, and President of the Security Council of the United Nations as well as all other relevant organs and bodies to condemn, in the strongest term, these inhumane terrorist acts.”Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, a nuclear scientist, was killed in a blast in Tehran on Wednesday morning, the latest in a series of attacks against such scientists in recent years.A motorcyclist placed a magnetic bomb under Roshan’s Peugeot 405. Two other scientists were killed in a similar fashion in the capital city in the last two years.Iran’s U.N. Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee blamed Israel for the attacks during an interview with CNN Wednesday night.“They are trying to assassinate the Iranian scientists to deprive Iranians from the right of using peaceful nuclear energy,” Khazaee said. “We believe that these terrorist attacks are supported by some elements — especially within the Israeli regime as well as some quarters around the world.”Other government officials in Iran leveled the same accusation throughout the day Wednesday, with Iranian lawmaker Kazem Jalali blaming the intelligence agencies of the United States and Israel.

The United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, also bore responsibility for passing on information about Iran’s nuclear scientists to other countries, state-run IRNA news agency said.On Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, rejected the claims.“I want to categorically deny any United States involvement in any kind of act of violence inside Iran,” she said.“We believe there has to be an understanding between Iran, its neighbors and the international community that finds a way forward for it to end its provocative behavior, end its search for nuclear weapons and rejoin the international community and be a productive member of it.”Israel does not normally comment on such claims. However, Brig. Gen. Yoav Mordechai, a spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces, said on his Facebook page Wednesday: “I have no idea who targeted the Iranian scientist but I certainly don’t shed a tear.”Roshan, 32, was a deputy director for commercial affairs at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility in Isfahan province and a graduate of Iran’s Oil Industry University, according to the semi-official news agency Fars.Natanz, which is said to have 8,000 centrifuges in operation, is one of two facilities that is enriching uranium in the country. This week, the IAEA identified the second in the mountains of Qom province.Officials in the United States and other Western nations have ratcheted up sanctions against Tehran since a November report by the IAEA said the Iranian government was developing the technology needed to build a nuclear weapon. Last month, U.S. President Barack Obama announced sanctions against Iran’s central bank.Tehran maintains its nuclear program is for civilian energy purposes only. 

But the IAEA has said it cannot verify whether the intent of Tehran’s nuclear program remains peaceful.The attack also comes at a time when relations between Iran and the United States have rarely been as strained. Iran sentenced Iranian-American and former Marine Amir Hekmati to death Tuesday for alleged espionage, prompting strong condemnation from the U.S. State Department.Iran also aggravated tensions in the past month with its threat to close the strategically important Strait of Hormuz if Western nations carry through with sanctions on its oil industry to punish Tehran’s lack of cooperation on its nuclear program. In comments Wednesday, RussianDeputyForeign Minister Sergei Ryabkov urged Western nations and Iran to avoid escalating the situation further, Russia’s official Itar-Tass news agency reported.The attacks have been eerily similar.On January 12, 2010, Iranian university professor and nuclear scientist Massoud Ali Mohammadi died in a blast when an assailant stuck a bomb under his car. Majid Jamali Fashi, an Iranian, reportedly confessed to the bombing and was sentenced to death in August, IRNA reported at the time.Prosecutors accused him of working for Israel’s spy agency Mossad and said he was paid $120,000 by Israel to carry out the hit, Fars reported. Israel does not comment on such claims.In November 2010, nuclear scientist Majid Shahriari was killed in a blast where, again, a bomb was stuck under a car by someone on a motorcycle. Another nuclear scientist, Prof. Fereydoun Abbasi Davani, and his wife were injured in a similar attack. Abbasi is now director of the Iran Atomic Energy Organization.With no one claiming responsibility, the killings remain shrouded in mystery leaving experts only to speculate. Several said Israel could have had a hand in the attacks.“The most likely contender among people who are following this is that the Israelis are doing it, possibly in cooperation with the Iranian mujahedin,” said Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian-American Council and author of the book, “A Single Roll of the Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran.”“There’s almost no downside for Israel,” he said. The killings “take out nuclear assets and embarrass Iran” by showing that the regime can’t prevent such attacks, Parsi said. And “if Iran retaliates with a violent act, then Israel can point to it as a reason to take military action against the regime.”A representative of the Mujahedin-e Khalq, or MEK, said the group had nothing to do with it and blamed the Iranian government. The Iraq-based group, also known as the People’s Mujahedin, is dedicated to the overthrow of Iran’s Islamic fundamentalist regime and classified by the U.S. government as an international terrorist group.“The Iranian Resistance revealed last year that (Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyed) Ali Khamenei ordered a special unit of the Revolutionary Guards that as soon as a sign is detected that one of the managers of experts of the nuclear program is distancing from the regime or has intention of leaving the country, he should be eliminated and the blame should be put on the (MEK),” said Shahin Gobadi, a spokesman for the National Council of Resistance of Iran, the political coalition that includes MEK.Some have speculated that the Iranian regime itself could have been involved in at least one of the killings, the one in January 2010.That attack came shortly after major riots against the regime, and many people thought the regime was behind that killing, Parsi said.Mohammadi “did not seem to be a particularly valuable nuclear target,” he said. Some reports suggested Mohammadi was an outspoken supporter of the “green movement,” and had helped organize protests, Parsi said.But the man killed in November 2010, Shahriari, and the one who survived an assassination attempt at the time, Davani, were a different story.It “would make no sense for the Iranians to assassinate them,” Parsi said. “They were critical nuclear assets.”