Showing posts with label kong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kong. Show all posts

Thursday, August 16, 2012

NEWS,16.08.2012


Beyond Money


The hole was too deep; these words couldn't fill it. But there they remain, floating on the regret, vibrant with the possibility of a different kind of world. We've always been in the process of building that world, but the process has lacked a central cohesion... a god, if you will, to bless it and keep it. Antonis Perris, an unemployed musician from Athens, found himself at age 60 living in a world where the love of his community didn't matter and probably wasn't even noticeable: He had lost his means to earn a living. Until Europe's economic crisis hit, he had sustained himself and his elderly mother performing at local taverns. He had done well. Then business dried up. Finally, he reached a point where he saw no way to keep on living. The brief story of his death last May one more "economic suicide" was reported recently in the Post:” The next morning, Perris took the hand of his ailing 90-year-old mother. They climbed to the roof of their apartment building and leapt to their death."Europe has had thousands of economic suicides in the last few years. They always shock the community. In Greece, which has been reeling in economic crisis for five years now, "The suicide notes left in coat pockets or on desks," the Post writes, "... are being passed around on the Internet and studied like the final treatises of revered scholars."Everyone loved him," a local cafĂ© owner said. People would have helped him out, and helped his mother, who suffered from Alzheimer's. But they didn't know how badly the two were doing. Now their deaths are a gash across the community, across the country and perhaps all of Europe and perhaps large parts of the so-called First World, where the middle class is crumbling. The poverty and despoliation the dark side of capitalism are no longer contained, relegated to the Third World and the Third World pockets of the First.The situation has gotten so bad that the idea of debt forgiveness is gaining mainstream cachet. Erik Kain, writing last October in Forbes, brought up "the old biblical idea of a jubilee  a national cancellation of private debts.” In many ways," he observed, "rather than creating a sustainable economy built around steadily rising middle and working class wages, we've built an unsustainable economy built on consumer debt. That debt has propelled the growth we've seen in recent years, acting as a sort of perpetual Keynesian injection into the economy. Now we're paying the price.” While I see debt forgiveness as a move in the right direction -- an acknowledgment that debt isn't simply a moral failing, and that the wealth of creditors, who have in so many ways rigged the game in their favor, isn't all the matters I wince at the provincialism of those who limit their concern to the American middle class, or would do no more to fix the system than increase wages for the working and professional classes. Better wages that are the result of devastated environmental regulations or that come at the expense of the Third World or future generations? The economic crisis is global in nature and the flaws of the system are deep and profound. "The economy's only valid purpose is to serve life," David Korten wrote this month in Yes! Magazine. The economy should not be an end in itself, an irresistible force that we fail to serve at our peril yet that's the conventional attitude. The economic suicides of Europe and, indeed, of every country on the planet, are testimony to the prevalence of this belief. We serve money as though it were God. When it disappears from our life, the most honourable alternative, as we stare into the abyss, is suicide. We live within an economic system that is cruel and impersonal, divorced from gratitude, empathy, compassion, love and nurturance. (Money, whatever else it is, is the root of all cynicism.) This system is also voracious. It's eating the planet: eating, i.e., privatizing and selling back to us, what was once the human and environmental commons, the context of all life. "Real capital assets," writes Korten in his excellent essay, "have productive value in their own right and cannot be created with a computer key stroke. The most essential forms of real capital are social capital (the bonds of trust and caring essential to healthy community function) and bio system capital (the living systems essential to Earth's capacity to support life). We are depleting both with reckless abandon.” Trapped within the present economic system, so many people have limited patience for what they value most deeply, e.g., the happiness and loving growth of children, the glorious fecundity of the earth, the peace that passes all understanding. Who has time? We all loved him, but...As the system crashes; we have the opportunity to look beyond it. Let's dig deeply to establish the foundation of its replacement. 

 

How One Disappearance Case May Prove China's Commitment to Rule of Law Post-Transition

 

A key question about the Chinese government's leadership transition later this year is whether as a rising power China can achieve internationally agreed-upon standards to respect and implement the rule of law for the benefit of its people. For all of the attention paid to the Bo Xilai scandal and circumstances involving government critics Ai Weiwei and Chen Guangcheng, one ongoing, largely unnoticed case may serve as a barometer for China's future in this area.Gendun Choekyi Nyima was just six years old in 1995 when he and members of his family were detained in Tibet and taken into "protective custody" by the Chinese government. Earlier that year the Dalai Lama declared the child to be the reincarnation of the Panchen Lama, the second-most influential leader in Tibetan Buddhism, following the death of the previous Panchen Lama in 1989.His whereabouts remain a closely guarded state secret. No reliable outside source knows where he is or what his condition is, apart from a few cryptic statements issued over the years by China's government, who most recently claimed Gendun Choekyi Nyima now 23 is in mainland China and doesn't want to be disturbed. "It's a reminder about how exceptionally efficient and capable the Chinese state is when it has a security priority, when it wants to hide someone away or keep something secret," said Robert Barnett, director of Columbia University's Modern Tibetan Studies program. The Panchen Lama, like the Dalai Lama, is a crucial figure to Tibetans, and plays a key role in identifying candidates to be the next Dalai Lama. Lobsang Nyandak Zayul, the Dalai Lama's representative for the Americas, expressed to me that the whereabouts and condition of Gendun Choekyi Nyima "are of great concern to the Tibetan people," whose right to interact with their spiritual leader has been taken away. Soon after detaining Gendun Choekyi Nyima and his family, China's government identified another Tibetan boy as the "official" Panchen Lama, whose rare and carefully managed public appearances to date have been punctuated with public statements supportive of China and state stability. Why did the Chinese government, which is officially atheist, get involved in a case of religious leadership succession? China views the Dalai Lama spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism and, until last year, head of Tibet's government in exile as a separatist threat. Less about religion, according to the Economist, "China has its eyes on a complex struggle that will play out" once the current aging Dalai Lama dies. "With the endorsement of its own Panchen Lama, China wants to choose a successor to the current Dalai Lama and seek to control him." Beijing is concerned that the Dalai Lama and his exile supporters will support another candidate perceived as Tibetans' spiritual leader. It’s a complicated story rooted in China's claims of historic sovereignty over Tibet. The implications are enormous, but the basic facts are simple: The Chinese government detained a six year-old and his family 17 years ago and nobody has seen them publicly since. By virtually any national or international standards this is illegal and morally outrageous. What does it say about the rule of law in China if people can be disappeared so easily? Meanwhile, circumstances for Tibetans worsen. Chinese authorities aggressively put down major riots in 2008, and in the last 18 months 45 Tibetans monks, nuns, and ordinary people have self-immolated in protest of China's harsh policies. Earlier this year China installed government monitors in nearly every monastery in Tibet in an effort to prevent separatist activities, and last month Human Rights Watch reported restrictions on news and information accessible by Tibetans inside China, to prevent views about the Dalai Lama and his followers not controlled by the Chinese government. According to Columbia's Barnett, "This is much deeper than just the issue of how to control the mechanics of appointing the next Dalai Lama," explaining that in attempting to establish stability in Tibet, on the one hand the "Communist Party recognizes that it can't win over Tibetans just by argument, ideology, or economic benefit. They believe they have to have a major traditional or religious leader as a puppet figure who will endorse their claims to the Tibetan people.” The greater political value for the Chinese government in having a quasi-official Panchen Lama is that he can be paraded around "not for Tibetan audiences but for Chinese audiences," Barnett said. The government, ever concerned with stability, "can use the army to control or suppress the six million or so Tibetans if they don't agree with China's choice for the Dalai Lama, but they can't use an army to force a billion Chinese to agree.” According to Michael Davis, visiting professor of law at Hong Kong University, China appears to believe "the Tibet problem will just go away if they grind down the Tibetans." But the unrest will continue because "Tibetans will continue to mobilize opposition to the Chinese policies and China will continue to bear foreign policy cost.” He added, "People figure if China treats its border Tibetan community like this, how will it treat other neighbours it dominates?” A spokesperson for China's United Nations mission in New York did not respond to repeated requests for comment, and calls to Beijing's embassy in Washington, D.C. went unanswered. While no one with whom I spoke had any information about the condition of Gendun Choekyi Nyima, it is possible the Chinese government may view him as a bargaining chip in stalled talks with Tibet's government in exile.” It would be extraordinary for China not to realize that they need to have that missing boy alive in order to get more concessions out of the exiles, if they ever go so far as to have serious talks," said Barnett. "But at the same time, they'll have to make some kind of compromise with the Tibetans' Panchen Lama, which would mean recognizing him in some secondary role.” What’s in it for China?” I think the upside is enormous," said Davis. The Dalai Lama, who has called for autonomy for Tibet but not independence from China, "is surely the most reasonable representative of the Tibetan community they are likely to encounter," he said. "They should take advantage of this while they can. The Dalai Lama is also peculiarly suited to gain popular Tibetan support for any settlement.” From the exiles' perspective, Lobsang Nyandak Zayul noted that "most of us have given up hope with the present administration in Beijing." Reengagement with the Chinese government may be possible "once they have established the next generation of leaders," he said. If Gendun Choekyi Nyima is alive and well, one of the following moves by China post-transition could send strong signals to its people, its neighbours, and to outside powers: Unconditionally release Gendun Choekyi Nyima, as the Dalai Lama's representatives have called for. Or at least allow a neutral party to actually meet with him and verify his well-being. The new leadership in China could seize an opening and signal a policy shift on talks with exiles, and quietly raise whether Gendun Choekyi Nyima could be released as a possibility in any talks. Of course, sustained media focus on the case could make China consider reputation impacts abroad. Broader factors involved in China's treatment of its peripheral communities unsettles China's neighbours, as well as powers like the United States and the EU, so the status quo seems to carry significant costs. If China is ready to assume its role as a major power on the world stage, with new political leadership it should accept the associated responsibilities -- including respect for the rule of law at home. China can start with credible information about Gendun Choekyi Nyima.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

NEWS,08.08.2012


Will Manufacturing Make China a Democracy?

 

The other day, I had lunch with an economist I respect and admire. I asked him, what would it take for China to become a modern democracy and build a strong middle class? OK. I didn't ask him that. I told him that China would need strong institutions of civil society, and a deeper sense of Social Contract to become a stable modern democracy with a dynamic middle class.In America's early history, we had strong institutions of civil society, such as free press, good education, and strong national identity. We wrote individual freedoms into our Constitution. We had respect for the rule of law, not much bribery, respect for science, and technical progress. We had social and economic mobility, opportunity and fairness. Well, at least for white males who owned property. But you see where I'm going with this. A robust civil society gives voice to workers, families and communities. It serves as a counter-balance to wealthy and powerful economic interests.China has a rich culture and strong national identity, but income inequality is growing in China, no free press, no unions, no environmental groups, and no real political system to make tough tradeoffs between wealthy powerful economic interests and the public good. Workers have no economic bargaining power. China's leaders have limited respect for the rule of law, and little willingness to enforce rule of law. China has done an exceptional job of acquiring the means of production. Not so much for human rights, labor rights, public health, or environmental protections. My economist friend told me, "No! Not buying it." China will modernize simply through economic transformation. I'm not sure what he meant, exactly. Maybe he meant that industrialization and democracy were the same thing, more or less. You get one with the other. My point was that you don't get one with the other. You might get a banana republic. You might get Egypt or something like Egypt, or Victorian England without a history of individual freedoms. Russians got plutocracy, corruption, murdered journalists, and a political system with zero credibility. You might get a lot of things, depending on what kind of civil society you have. National politics is really a contest between short-term investor interests and long-term public interests. Investors will act in their short-term interest. Public good often works in the long term. Market forces will not protect public good. For that, you need an effective political system. Colombia is a poster child for dysfunctional political and economic systems. Their culture and national identity are proud enough, but working Colombians are kidnapped, intimidated and killed routinely, as punishment for political involvement. Prosecutors, judges and justice ministers live in the shadow of violence. The last thing Colombia needed was a so-called Free Trade Agreement, which increases rights and powers for global businesses and weakens rights and powers for civil society. Now, Colombia faces worsening inequality and more social disruption. Japan, Germany, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and other modern democracies have strong social cohesion, strong institutions of civil society and strong middle classes. These outcomes are not accidental. They are the result of deliberate political choices these countries made. I asked my friend about China becoming a modern democracy. My real question wasn't about China, or Colombia, for that matter. I was really asking about America. What happens to our prosperity, our middle class, and our institutions of civil society? In the last 30 years, our civil society has weakened. Political and economic power are concentrating in the hands of the top 1%. Our respect for science has been replaced with ideology and denial. We disparage public education, and public employees. Our social cohesion is so weak that we envy our neighbors who still have pensions. Rule of law is becoming situational - it doesn'treally apply to big banks or foreclosure robo-signers. Political campaigns are so expensive that elected officials literally cannot afford to govern for the public good. They can only govern for the wealthy and powerful. Within this 30-year decline for civil society, our so-called free trade policy steadily lowers the bar for democratic political process, substituting global business interests for public interest.In his new book, Nobel laureate economist, Joseph Stiglitz, calls globalization, as we've managed it, "global governance without global government." In Western democracies, we solve tough social and political problems through a political process. However, in so-called free trade agreements, global businesses write the rules, then we send disputes to anonymous tribunals. Democratic problem-solving does not happen in the trade agreements. It won't happen in Colombia. I don't see how it will happen in China. It's becoming more difficult in America. This is really about political and economic power. In the conclusion to his book, Stiglitz offers two possibilities. One is that we in the 99%, can recognize our predicament and reclaim our political birthright. Alternatively, the 1% can recognize their "self-interest, properly understood," and lead the way back to a sustainable democracy. Stiglitz traces this back to Alexis de Tocqueville in 1835. Americans understood a basic fact: looking out for the other guy isn't just good for the soul - it's good for business. The top 1 percent have the best houses, the best educations, the best doctors, and the best lifestyles, but there is one thing that money doesn't seem to have bought: an understanding that their fate is bound up with how the other 99 percent live. Throughout history, this is something that the top 1 percent eventually do learn.Yeah. That would be good.

 

Blair concerned about UK exit from the EU


Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair told a German newspaper he was "deeply worried" Britain might opt to leave the European Union in a referendum, particularly if too many powers were transferred to Brussels without democratic legitimacy.Talk of Britain leaving the EU was once far fetched, but the euro zone debt crisis and the prospect of the currency bloc forging a closer political union have convinced some senior UK politicians it is time to demand a new relationship with Brussels.Current Prime Minister David Cameron said last month it was a "perfectly honourable position" to call for an immediate referendum on Britain's EU membership - something polls show a majority of British people would vote to reject - but that he would never campaign for an "out" vote because leaving the EU would not serve British interests.Blair told Die Zeit it was clear that the euro zone crisis would lead to a "powerful political change of the EU", adding: "And on this point, I am deeply worried that Britain could decide by referendum to leave the whole process.""If more competences are transferred to the EU, then its democratic legitimacy must be built up too," he said, according to a German transcript of the interview which is due to be published on Thursday. "Britain must play a strong role in this. Because we need a balance between European institutions and the nation states.""If this is done wrongly, we could create a political crisis that could become just as a big as the euro crisis. People will not go along with the abolishment of the nation state."Cameron has tried to stave off demands for an immediate vote on Britain's EU membership by holding out the prospect of a referendum some time in the future and by promising a new relationship with the EU.He vetoed a new EU fiscal treaty in December, forcing euro zone states to set their new rules outside the formal EU structure, while using its institutions.Sceptics say EU regulations shackle Britain's $2.5 trillion economy and that leaving the 27-nation bloc would allow London to restore its sovereignty while saving billions of dollars in membership dues.However, supporters of membership argue Britain would lose influence if it left the EU, its biggest trading partner, and that its economy would still be influenced by rules made in Brussels anyway.

HK Airlines to quit London service

 

Hong Kong Airlines will end its service between Hong Kong and London due to poor demand, reports said on Wednesday, another blow to the carrier after authorities banned its expansion. "The last flight from London to Hong Kong will be on September 10," Hong Kong Airlines General Manager Albert Chan told Dow Jones Newswires, meaning the service will have run for just seven months. The airline uses three Airbus 330-200 planes for the flights which are fitted exclusively with business-class seats. The service costs around HK$10m ($1.3m) a month to run, the South China Morning Post newspaper reported. The airline did not immediately respond to requests for comment.The move followed an unprecedented aviation authority ban last month on the airline's expansion, limiting the types of aircraft the company can operate until the airline meets all safety requirements for operating a larger fleet.The airline said it supported the conditions, adding they were sensible for a company at their stage of growth."Given the profitability of our regional routes, we believe that we now have the optimal fleet to continue to build a business... focused on Asia Pacific," an HKA spokesperson told AFP on Monday.Hong Kong Airlines was established in 2006 and operates 21 aircraft flying to locations in mainland China and international destinations ranging from Tokyo to Bangkok.HKA flights were severely delayed and cancelled when a typhoon lashed Hong Kong last month, leaving hundreds of passengers stranded.


Thursday, March 15, 2012

NEWS,15.3.2012


China removes top leadership contender Bo from post

 

 

Ambitious Chinese Communist Party leadership contender Bo Xilai has been toppled from his post as head of the inland city of Chongqing, in a move risking a backlash from backers of his controversial vision of socialist growth. His abrupt downfall, announced on Thursday by the official Xinhua news agency, exposes ideological divisions as a new generation prepares to take power in China later this year, and may stir tensions between supporters of his more traditional, state-dominated version of socialism, and liberal critics, who saw him as a dangerous opportunist. Bo was removed as party boss of Chongqing, a sprawling region in the southwest that he turned into a bastion of Communist revolutionary-inspired "red" culture and egalitarian growth, a day after being rebuked by Premier Wen Jiabao in a news conference broadcast live across the country. The telegenic Bo had been a contender for top leadership, but his prospects suffered a blow after Vice Mayor Wang Lijun, previously his long time police chief, went to ground in February in the U.S. consulate in nearby Chengdu until he was coaxed out and placed under investigation.Xinhua said Vice Premier Zhang Dejiang will replace Bo, but gave no further details. It also said Wang had been removed from his vice mayor post. When announcing Bo's dismissing, the head of the party's powerful organisational department, Li Yuanchao, said the move was made "in light of the serious political repercussions of the Wang Lijun incident," according to Chinese news reports that cited a Chongqing television report. Vice Mayor Wang had earlier been a key figure in a drive against organised crime that garnered Bo nationwide attention. While Bo might be kept on in some role until the Communist Party leadership succession this autumn, his hopes for promotion to a top job were finished, said Chen Ziming, an independent scholar in Beijing who follows party politics.” Now it looks like Wen Jiabao's comments yesterday represented the leadership's collective view that Bo needed to go," said Chen, referring to the premier's pointed rebuke of Bo."This will affect the leadership politics for the 18th Congress, because this opens up new uncertainties about who is in contention," said Chen.The 18th Party Congress late this year will see China's biggest leadership transition in nearly a decade, with Party Chief Hu Jintao and other elders due to retire and hand power to a younger generation headed by Vice President Xi Jinping.Unlike Bo, Xi has shied away from the limelight. Both are "princelings", the term for children of current, retired or late revolutionary leaders."The fact that the Xinhua announcement did not stress that Bo will be placed in another post means that he's probably going to be put under investigation, and there won't be any conclusion on his future until the end of that," said one source, a journalist with extensive contacts among central and Chongqing officials. He spoke on condition of anonymity to protect himself and his contacts.Bo's fall from a confident defence of his policies at a news conference last week to dismissal this week has come while central authorities push forward with an investigation into Wang's flight to the U.S. mission.Bo has plenty of fans, attracted to the idea of a "Chongqing model" of development that promises greater equality. Some were riled by his sudden departure."The removal of Bo Xilai is a real shock to me. We don't know whether it's because of his personal errors or is an attack on the Chongqing model," said Sima Nan, a leftist writer and broadcaster in Beijing who has praised Bo."If this amounts to a negation of the Chongqing model, then I can't agree with this decision."Wen added to the cloud hanging over Bo on Wednesday by scolding Chongqing for the scandal and obliquely warning against nostalgia for the Mao Zedong era."Well, the good news, I guess, is that the risks of leftism and extremism in Chinese politics have just taken a nose dive," said David Zweig, a scholar of Chinese politics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology."I guess nobody really knew what he believed in, except self-promotion, and now the self-promotion has done him in, which is good," said Zweig.Bo's removal quickly became one of the most talked about topics on China's Twitter-like microblogging site Weibo, with the normal censorship of discussion on top leaders strangely absent. Many people expressed support for Bo."With the anti-mafia heroes Bo and Wang both gone, what are we going to do now?" wrote Jin Zhiheng.The man who takes in Chongqing, Vice Premier Zhang, studied economics in North Korea and is a former party boss in the export-dependent southern province of Guangdong. Unusually, he retains his vice premiership despite his new position.Xinhua did not mention whether Bo could lose his seat in the Politburo, a central decision-making body that sits under the more powerful Standing Committee. The Politburo itself would have to make that decision.The mayor of Chongqing, Huang Qifan, widely seen as the brains behind the city's elaborate growth plans, appeared to survive the fall of Bo, at least for now.Huang said he would "resolutely support the handling of the Wang Lijun incident, and the adjustment of the municipal leadership," the news reports said, citing the Chongqing television broadcast.