Higher enrichment at Iranian site
The UN atomic agency has found evidence at an
underground bunker in Iran that could mean the country has moved closer to
producing the uranium threshold needed to arm nuclear missiles, diplomats said
on Friday.The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has found traces of
uranium enriched up to 27% at Iran's Fordo enrichment plant, the diplomats told
The Associated Press.That is still substantially below the 90% level needed to
make the fissile core of nuclear arms. But it is above Iran's highest-known
enrichment grade, which is close to 20%, and which already can be turned into
weapons-grade material much more quickly than the Islamic Republic's main
stockpile, which can only be used for fuel at around 3.5%.The diplomats - who
demanded anonymity because their information is privileged - said the find did
not necessarily mean that Iran was covertly raising its enrichment threshold
toward weapons-grade level. They said one likely explanation was that the
centrifuges that produce enriched uranium initially over-enriched at the start
as technicians adjusted their output - an assessment shared by nonproliferation
expert David Albright.Albright, whose Washington-based Institute for Science
and International Security looks for signs of proliferation, said a new
configuration for the cascades set up in tandem at Fordo means they tend to
"overshoot 20%" at start up.Sanctions"Nonetheless,
embarrassing for Iran," he wrote in an e-mail to the AP.Calls to Ali
Asghar Soltanieh, Iran's chief delegate to the IAEA, were rejected and the
switchboard operator at the Iranian mission said he was not available. IAEA
media officials said the agency had no comment.Iran is under several rounds of
UN sanctions for its failure to disclose information on its controversial
nuclear programme. Tehran says it is enriching uranium to provide more nuclear
energy for its growing population, while the US and other nations fear that
Iran doing that to have the ability to make nuclear weapons.The latest attempts
to persuade Iran to compromise and let UN experts view its nuclear programme
ended inconclusively on Wednesday at a meeting in Baghdad. At the talks, six
nations - the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany -
failed to gain traction in efforts to persuade Tehran to freeze its 20%
enrichment. Envoys said the group will meet again next month in Moscow.Iran
started enriching to 20% last year, mostly at Fordo, saying it needed the
material to fuel a research reactor and for medical purposes. HopeStill, its long-standing
refusal to stop enrichment and accept reactor fuel from abroad has sparked
fears it wants to expand its domestic programme to be able to turn it toward
making weapons.Those concerns have increased since it started higher enrichment
at Fordo, which is carved into a mountain. That, say Iranian officials, makes
it impervious to attack from Israel or the United States, which have not ruled
out using force as a last option if diplomacy fails to curb the Islamic
Republic's nuclear programme.Even though Wednesday's talks were unproductive,
diplomats saw hope in the promise of another meeting."It is clear that we
both want to make progress and that there is some common ground," European
Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who is formally leading the talks,
told reporters. "However, significant differences remain. Nonetheless, we do agree on the
need for further discussion to expand that common ground."Significant differencesSaeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear
negotiator, offered a lukewarm assessment of Wednesday's negotiations, in light
of European and American refusal to lift tough sanctions against Iran as Tehran had hoped."The result of the talks was that we were able to get more familiar with
the views of each other," Jalili told reporters.In Washington, Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton said significant differences remain between the two
sides and that it's now up to Iran "to close the gaps"."Iran now has the choice to
make: Will it meet its international obligations and give the world confidence
about its intentions or not?" Clinton said.Iran went into Wednesday's
talks urging the West to scale back on recently toughened sanctions, which have
targeted Iran's critical oil exports and have effectively blackballed the country
from international banking networks. The 27-nation European Union is set to ban
all Iranian fuel imports on 1 July, shutting the door on about 18% of Iran's
market.Experiments The diplomats
said a confidential IAEA report on Iran's nuclear programme to be released
later on Friday to the agency's 35-nation board will mention of the traces of
27% enrichment found at Fordo.Iran already has around 700 centrifuges churning
out 20% enriched uranium at Fordo. The diplomats said the report will also note
that - while Iran has set up around 350 more centrifuges since late last year,
at the site - these machines are not enriching.While the reason for that could
be purely technical, it could also serve as a signal from Tehran that it is
waiting for progress in the negotiations.The report is also expected to detail
the state of talks between the UN nuclear agency and Iran that the agency hopes
will re-launch a long-stalled probe into suspicions that Tehran has worked on
nuclear-weapons related experiments - charges that Tehran denies.
Next stop Moscow for Iran nuclear talks
Iran and six world powers achieved little in
two days of intense nuclear talks in Baghdad except arranging another meeting
in Moscow next month and establishing they are poles apart on crucial issues.The
latest diplomatic push between Iran and the P5+1 - the United States, Russia,
China, Britain, France and Germany - at one stage even looked unlikely to take
place until desperate eleventh-hour efforts managed to salvage the process -
for now."We remain determined to resolve this problem in the near term
through negotiations, and will continue to make every effort to that end,"
Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, said after two "very
intense" days of talks."What we have now is some common ground and a
meeting in place where we can take that further forward," she said,
announcing the next round would take place in Moscow on 18-19 June.She added
however that there remained "significant differences" and that Iran
must take "concrete and practical steps to urgently meet the concerns of
the international community".The main bone of contention was - and will
remain in Moscow - the speed at which the P5+1 eases sanctions in return for
the Islamic republic scaling back the most sensitive parts of its nuclear
programme.SweetenersAshton put
forward in the Iraqi capital on behalf of the six powers a new package of
proposals that clearly went down badly with the Iranians.The P5+1 want Iran to
restrict to purities of 20% the enrichment of uranium, the area of Iran's
activities that most raises their suspicions that Iran is seeking to develop a
nuclear arsenal.In return reports indicated the international powers are
prepared to offer a variety of sweeteners, including fuel plates for a reactor
producing medical isotopes, relaxing restrictions on aircraft parts and nuclear
safety assistance.But this falls short of the lifting of the whole raft of UN
Security Council and unilateral Western sanctions that have been hit Iran's
economy for years.Reflecting official thinking in Tehran, state media ran
reports slammed the package, with the IRNA news agency calling it as
"outdated, not comprehensive, and unbalanced".Iran meanwhile is loath
to give up what its chief negotiator in Baghdad, Saeed Jalili called its
"absolute right" to uranium enrichment.Oil embargo
In the end, with the Baghdad talks extended several times - they were originally only meant to last one day - the two sides agreed to differ, setting the stage for what may be a make-or-break gathering in the Russian capital.Neither side can afford to keep the process going indefinitely without some tangible progress.Iran is threatened with an EU oil embargo, due to take full effect from 1 July, that will also bar EU firms from insuring crude tankers heading to countries such as India, South Korea and Japan, all major buyers of Iran's oil.Israel, which is widely considered to have the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear arsenal, sees itself as Tehran's number-one target if Iran acquires the bomb and is highly sceptical that diplomacy will work.Like the United States, it has refused to rule out military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities to prevent it developing a weapons capability.Oil prices have risen higher as a result, hurting global growth just as the eurozone crisis threatens to return with a vengeance and as US President Barack Obama seeks re-election in November on the back of an improving economy.Military optionObama, who campaigned in 2008 for his first term promising to reach out to Tehran, is also wary of his Iran policy being branded as soft and a failure by his Republican challenger Mitt Romney."A freeze on new sanctions in exchange for a freeze on new enrichment activity is still possible," Mark Fitzpatrick at the International Institute for Strategic Studies think-tank in London said."The danger is that if they drag on too long, diplomacy will be seen to have failed by many in Israel and elsewhere, which will bring renewed talk of a military option."
In the end, with the Baghdad talks extended several times - they were originally only meant to last one day - the two sides agreed to differ, setting the stage for what may be a make-or-break gathering in the Russian capital.Neither side can afford to keep the process going indefinitely without some tangible progress.Iran is threatened with an EU oil embargo, due to take full effect from 1 July, that will also bar EU firms from insuring crude tankers heading to countries such as India, South Korea and Japan, all major buyers of Iran's oil.Israel, which is widely considered to have the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear arsenal, sees itself as Tehran's number-one target if Iran acquires the bomb and is highly sceptical that diplomacy will work.Like the United States, it has refused to rule out military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities to prevent it developing a weapons capability.Oil prices have risen higher as a result, hurting global growth just as the eurozone crisis threatens to return with a vengeance and as US President Barack Obama seeks re-election in November on the back of an improving economy.Military optionObama, who campaigned in 2008 for his first term promising to reach out to Tehran, is also wary of his Iran policy being branded as soft and a failure by his Republican challenger Mitt Romney."A freeze on new sanctions in exchange for a freeze on new enrichment activity is still possible," Mark Fitzpatrick at the International Institute for Strategic Studies think-tank in London said."The danger is that if they drag on too long, diplomacy will be seen to have failed by many in Israel and elsewhere, which will bring renewed talk of a military option."
No comments:
Post a Comment