Fiat boss eyes Chrysler merger in 2014
Fiat boss Sergio
Marchionne said Sunday that he expected the merger of the Italian car giant and
its US partner Chrysler will take place in 2014."We will succeed in doing
it," he said in an interview with the editor of the Repubblica newspaper.
"We and VEBA (the United Auto Workers pension fund a Chrysler
shareholder) have different opinions on the value of Chrysler but we will
resolve the problem in 2014."Macchione, who heads both companies, had said
on January 30 that the ties between the two automakers were
"irreversible" and would merge "as soon as I can afford it"
but did not put date on the merger.Asked on Sunday if Fiat would keep its Turin
headquarters Macchione said: "We are a big group present throughout the
world, it will depend on access to financial markets and the choices of the
Agnelli family" who founded Fiat.He had "not thought" about the
future name of the new entity, he said.The deal will ultimately give Fiat a 65%
stake in Chrysler and full ownership by 2015.Boosted by increased sales at
Chrysler, the Italian giant on Wednesday reported a profitable 2012, announcing
a fourth quarter net profit that rose to €388m from €265m the year before.The
company said it was aiming for profits of between €1.2bn and €1.5bn this
year.Fiat took a 20% stake in Chrysler in 2009 as the third largest US
automaker emerged from a government-financed restructuring under bankruptcy
protection.It has since steadily expanded its stake by purchasing shares owned
by the US government and the VEBA fund.
Starbucks tax offer too little, too late
Despite pledging to
pay millions of pounds in extra tax in Britain, Starbucks faces a battle to
restore its reputation over its fiscal stance, with analysts saying the offer
is "too little too late".With 760 Starbucks outlets dotting Britain,
coffee lovers need not travel far to find the familiar green signage and grab a
frothy latte or a flat white.But surveys suggest British consumers may be
losing appetite for the US chain following the revelation last year that it has
paid just £8.6m in British corporation tax since 1998, despite generating £3
billion in revenues.The revelations sparked a stream of negative publicity plus
protests outside coffee shops which analysts say hit the brand hard, though
Starbucks itself insists "UK customers have remained loyal".Under the
weight of pressure from lawmakers and consumers, the company pledged in
December to pay an additional £20m in corporation tax over two years.But Sarah
Murphy, director of market researchers YouGov BrandIndex, said the offer
"has done little to slow down negative sentiment surrounding the
brand."BrandIndex has tracked public perception of the coffee giant over
several months. Its "Buzz" index gives companies a score based on what
people have been hearing about the brand, with zero representing equal levels
of positive and negative.In early October Starbucks' Buzz score stood at +1.9,
but this plummeted to -28.4 following the tax headlines, and reached -45.2 in mid-December."That was quite a significant decline," said
Murphy, adding that measures of perceptions of Starbucks' quality and value
also sank during that time.In November, Britain's parliamentary accounts
committee grilled top executives from Google, Amazon and Starbucks over their
tax affairs.The apparent peak in negativity surrounding Starbucks in December
came after the committee's chairman Margaret Hodge slammed companies involved
in tax avoidance schemes as "totally immoral".Since then, Murphy says
the brand "does seem to be making a slow recovery", but that the
company "did too little too late."Social media agency Yomego
identified similar patterns. It tracked online conversation over the same
period and found negative comments about Starbucks increasingly outweighed positive.Some
95% of comments on Starbucks UK's Facebook and Twitter pages made reference to
tax evasion, analysts said.Yomego managing director Steve Richards said:
"The outrage over tax avoidance can't help but have an impact on a
company's reputation in social channels."The old adage that 'bad news
travels fast' has never been more true. Now news has so many channels to travel
through, with the potential to multiply as people comment on and share
stories."But does negative chatter cause consumers to shop
elsewhere?Restaurant manager Julia Stypik said she's "not a huge fan of
Starbucks... There's much better coffee and plenty of competitors."However
this did not stop her frequenting a busy London branch of the chain
one lunch-hour.On the tax issue, she told AFP: "I think they have been
very clever but this should end at some point. It's unfair. Everyone has to pay
taxes. "Some critics argue Starbucks is being unfairly targeted; Britain needs to tighten up on loopholes which allow companies to pay less
corporation tax by moving profits abroad. Starbucks has acknowledged paying no
corporation tax for three years on sales worth £400m owing to fees paid to
other parts of its business. Executives insist its British division is
unprofitable.Despite operating within the law, the multinational has borne
fierce criticism from lawmakers, including Prime Minister David Cameron who
told the World Economic Forum in Davos last month that tax-avoiding companies
must "wake up and smell the coffee".The swipe was ill-received by
Starbucks, according to the Sunday Telegraph which claimed it threatened to
pull £100m of British investment, though a source close to the company told AFP
"no threat was made".A Starbucks spokesperson said: "Starbucks
agrees with the prime minister that all businesses should pay their fair
share."In the UK, we employ 9 000
people, contribute £300m a year to the economy and are foregoing tax deductions
that will make the Exchequer at least £20m better off."Starbucks says it
remains "fully committed" to opening 300 new stores and creating 5
000 new jobs by 2016.
Kuwait growth to slow - report
Oil-driven economic
growth in the Gulf state of Kuwait is forecast to slow down this year and in
2014 as crude output is expected to remain flat, the National Bank of Kuwait
said in a report Sunday.After Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by a healthy
6.1% in real terms last year, thanks to continued strong oil income, it is
forecast to drop to 3.2% in 2013 and to 2.5% in 2014, NBK said.Following a
massive contraction of around 8% in 2009 due to the impact of the global
financial crisis, Kuwait's economy gradually rebounded to grow by around 8% in
2011 as oil output and price remained high.Oil income in the OPEC member
contributes an average of 95% to public revenues. Kuwait ended the past 13
fiscal years in the black and is forecast to post a huge budget surplus in the
current fiscal year which ends on March 31.Oil GDP, which grew by 15% and 10%
in 2011 and 2012 respectively, is expected to remain flat this year and contract
by around 1.5% in 2014, according to the NBK report.But the bank revised upward
expected non-oil GDP growth from 4% to 5% this year based on signs of greater
determination by the authorities to implement large infrastructure
projects.Most projects under a $110bn four-year development plan, that runs
until 2014, have been stalled because of a political crisis in the emirate.The
opposition has staged protests to demand the dissolution of parliament elected
last month on the basis of an electoral law that was amended by the emir,
claiming that the change is illegal and aimed at electing a rubber stamp
body.But over the past few months, authorities either signed or gave the green
light for mega projects worth around $40bn, mostly in the oil and power sectors.Inflation
this year and next is expected to remain moderate at between 3-4%.Kuwait says
it sits on around 10% of global oil reserves and pumps around 3.0 million
barrels per day. It is estimated to have $400bn in foreign assets run by the
sovereign wealth fund.The emirate has a native population of 1.2 million in
addition to 2.6 million foreigners, mostly Asians and Arabs.
China's shortage threatens economy
China's demographic
timebomb is ticking much louder with the first fall in its labour pool for decades,
analysts say, highlighting the risk that the country grows old before it grows
rich.The abundant supply of cheap workers in the world's most populous nation
has created unprecedented cost efficiencies that underpinned its blistering
economic expansion over the past 35 years, propelling the global economy
forward.But now the inexorable consequences of the one-child policy imposed in
the late 1970s are beginning to appear, and threaten to impact its future
growth.China's working-age population, defined as 15-59, fell 3.45 million last
year, official data showed earlier this month the first decline since 1963,
after tens of millions died in a famine caused by the Great Leap Forward.The
immediate effect may be small in a nation of 1.35 billion people, but the
cumulative effects will accelerate over the coming decades.The number of people
aged between 15 and 64 will drop by around 40 million between 2014 and 2030,
said Wang Guangzhou, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
(CASS), a government think-tank --more than Poland's entire
population."The population is aging so fast that we are running short of
time to deal with it," said Li Jun, also of CASS, adding the family
planning policy had exacerbated the problem.China's proportion of over-65-year-olds
is projected to double from seven to 14% over only 26 years a key demographic
measure that took the United States 69 years to complete."Undoubtedly it
will substantially slow down China's potential growth rate," Yao Wei, an
economist with Societe Generale in Hong Kong, told AFP.An ageing population not
only means fewer people available to employ and higher labour costs, but
investment a key driver of China's growth will be harder to maintain as
families spend their savings on health care, she said.Chinese authorities
maintain that controlling its population growth has been key to increasing its
prosperity.But while China has risen to become the world's second-largest
economy, on a per capita basis it still lags far behind the US and other developed
countries.Industrial disputes have become more common in recent years, as
workers demand higher pay and better working conditions on the back of growing
awareness of their rights and the shortage of skilled staff.Multinational
companies are looking to other developing economies with lower wages for
further expansion, with some already moving production bases out of China to
rivals such as Indonesia and Vietnam.In a survey of 514 Japanese manufacturers
by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation last year, the number of
respondents voting China as the top destination for overseas business fell by
more than 10 percentage points on 2011.Economists said China must look to speed
up the transformation of its economic model and move up the value chain.The
golden period of the manufacturing industry, particularly those depending on
exports, has gone," said Yao.At the same time, she said, the country was
woefully underprepared to meet the burden of caring for the elderly."The
fiscal situation is not prepared and the social security network is not
complete," she said.By around 2060, every three Chinese workers will have
to support two people above 60, compared with a ratio of five to one now,
according to Li's projections.It is a crucial challenge for the ruling
Communist Party, said Ren Xianfang, a Beijing-based analyst with research firm
IHS Global Insight."Delivering growth and delivering social security to
the general public are the key things for the state to (maintain) its
legitimacy."Analysts said the medical services are increasingly expensive
and hard to access, while the country's flagship public pension plans are
crippled by problems including insolvency risks, difficulties in expanding
coverage and mismanagement.A rural areas programme was introduced in 2009 to
provide people from the countryside with their first ever state-subsided
retirement scheme, but its payouts are particularly meagre in many areas as low
as 55 yuan ($9) a month.The husband of Du Wenlan, a farmer from Chongqing, gets
80 yuan a month from the plan. She only buys new clothes once every three
years, she said, and tries to save money by diluting their rice
porridge."What can 80 yuan do?" she asked.On the streets of Beijing, Su Xu, 30, who works
for a cosmetics company, told AFP: "I panic when I think about my
retirement."
Why 'A players' matter
It's All About Who You Hire, How They Lead...
and Other Essential Advice from a Self-Made Leader by Morton L MandelTHIS is an unusual book on leadership.It is the distilled wisdom of an American
businessman and philanthropist, but that in itself is not unusual as there are
literally thousands of books of this kind.There are three facts that make this
book unusual. First, Mandel was described by the business guru, Peter Drucker,
in a Forbes magazine article as one of the three businessmen he admired most.
(The other two were Jack Welsh of General Electric and Andy Grove of
Intel.)Second, his company, Premier Industrial Corporation, was the lead
anecdote in a Business Week cover story on customer service, and superlative
customer service is always the result of a business that is well
managed.Finally, Mandel is a self-made dollar billionaire; his is a genuine
story of rags to riches.The title of the book, “It is all about who you
hire" encapsulates much of its wisdom. Great leaders have always had an
undue impact on the organisations they lead, whether the organisation is a
non-profit, a for-profit or a country.This position has led to Mandel insisting
that only “A players” occupy leadership positions in his own companies, and in
the many public benefit organisations he served and those he established with
his own wealth.In a conversation with Mandel, Drucker asserted that you must
always put your very best person into your greatest opportunity. When Mandel
countered with the question: what if your best person is dentist and your
greatest opportunity is a brass foundry, Drucker replied that the best person
would fast realise what he could not do and fast find the right person to do
it.This begs the question what is an “A player?” Mandel has five criteria:
intellect, values, passion, work ethic, and experience in this order.The
complexity of modern business requires its leader to have intellectual
firepower, that ability to analyse facts correctly, interrogate situations
cleverly, apply thoughtful judgement, and make good decisions.Fortunately,
there are many ways to see a person’s intellect and Mandel favours school and
university grades because they are taken over long periods and therefore are
more reliable than a quick test or flash of brilliance in an interview. Values
are harder to discern, but how a candidate talks about their parents, teacher
and role models does provide clues.Intellect and values without passion won’t
get results you require from the leader. Passion, unlike values, is much easier
to discern because you can feel it, hear, it see it. If you can feel it, so
will the leader’s staff.The work ethic Mandel is referring to is not only the
capacity to work long and work hard, but the way you engage with your work. The
work ethic is the belief that work goes a long way in defining
oneself.Experience comes last on this list of what you look for when you hire
an “A player” because you can help an incumbent to have the relevant experience
if he has the other four ingredients.“A players” will need to be paid well, but
this is always a small investment for the type of return they are able create.
A greater problem is keeping them; they will not stay long in a company or
organisation which does not have a rich, deep and ethical culture.A deeply
ethical culture is the created and maintained only through diligently enforcing
and reinforcing ethical behaviour between staff, and between the company and
its suppliers and customers. It requires the establishing codes of conduct that
are taken seriously, and never giving in to the temptation to compromise even
if the cost is high.Mandel recalls a hugely valuable deal his firm had worked
hard to close. When it was secured, the representative of the customer company
explained that a 5% consideration was required a veiled request for a “side
payment.”There was no discussion as to whether Mandel’s company should accede
to the request, so clear were the company's values to all. They don’t engage in
dishonest practices, no matter the cost, so the deal was declined.The style of
management practised and promoted by Mandel is the polar opposite of the
laissez faire type, where the CEO hires his leaders and releases them to do as
they will. It is also not a command and control style.Mandel stays on top of
all issues to provide guidance and assistance so that both the decisions and
the execution are superb.The managers we want out of our way are invariably the
managers who we do not respect. These are not managers who are helping you to
do your best work; rather, they want you to blindly execute their will.One of
the techniques to achieve your personal best in your private life as well as
your career is the “Factsbook.” This is a three-ring binder that every leader
at every level has that contains minutes of every meeting you have with your
manager, all your assignments, your progress in these assignments, and even a
schedule of your meetings for the year.At the beginning of each meeting the
notes from the last meeting are read aloud to the manager. This seemingly odd
practice is of enormous value in keeping responsibilities clear and ensuring
they are fulfilled. Consider this: how many times have decisions you and a
staff member agreed should be done, not been carried out? Then read the chapter
on Factbooks and start using them.The book covers a wide array of thoughts
ranging from uncommonly high commitment to satisfying a customer to what to
watch out for in mergers or acquisitions. Many of the lessons were learned from
Mandel’s successes, but equally from failures or missteps. What Mandel
stresses, as seen from having been there, is that there is no difference
between running a for-profit and a not-for-profit organisation. The only
difference is the measures of success.This book will enlighten you, remind you
of things you already know, but perhaps don’t practice, and give you a
perspective on doing business successfully. The approach works. Mandel proved
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment