Cyber-Attacks 'Bought Us Time' On Iran: U.S. Sources
The United States under former President George W.
Bush began building a complex cyber-weapon to try to prevent Tehran from
completing suspected nuclear weapons work without resorting to risky military
strikes against Iranian facilities, current and former U.S. officials familiar
with the program said.Barack Obama accelerated the efforts after succeeding
Bush in 2009, according to the sources who spoke on condition of anonymity
because of the classified nature of the effort. The weapon, called Stuxnet, was
eventually used against Iran's main uranium enrichment facilities.The effort was
intended to bridge the time of uncertainty between U.S. administrations after
the 2008 presidential election in which Obama was elected, and allow more time
for sanctions and diplomacy to avert Iranian nuclear weapon development,
according to the current and former officials.The sources gave rare insight
into the U.S. development of its cyber-warfare capabilities and the intent
behind it.One source familiar with the Bush administration's initial work on
Stuxnet said it had stalled Iran's nuclear program by about five years."It
bought us time. First, it was to get across from one administration to the next
without having the issue blow up. And then it was to give Obama a little more
time to come up with alternatives, through the sanctions, et cetera," said
the source.Only in recent months have U.S. officials become more open about the
work of the United States and Israel on Stuxnet, the sophisticated cyber-weapon
directed against Iran's Natanz nuclear enrichment facility that was first
detected in 2010.The cyber-attacks provided the United States with an avenue to
try to stop Iran from producing a suspected weapon without turning to military
strikes against Iranian facilities - all at a time when U.S. forces already
were fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the sources said.In the end, senior
U.S. officials agreed the benefit of stalling Iran's nuclear program was
greater than the risks of the virus being harnessed by other countries or
terrorist groups to attack U.S. facilities, one source said.Two sources with
direct knowledge of the U.S. program said it cost hundreds of millions of
dollars to carry out.The United States for years has been developing - and
using - offensive cyber-capabilities to interfere with the computers of
adversaries, including during the Battle of Falluja in Iraq in 2004 and in
finding Osama bin Laden and other al Qaeda figures, the sources said.Last year,
the United States also explicitly stated for the first time that it reserved
the right to retaliate with military force against a cyber-attack.The New York
Times reported on Friday that from his first months in office, Obama secretly
ordered attacks of growing sophistication on the computer systems running the
main Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities, greatly widening the first sustained
U.S. use of cyber-weapons. The Times said the attacks were code-named Olympic
Games.White House spokesman Josh Earnest declined comment on the substance of
the New York Times article, but denied "in the strongest possible
terms" that it was an authorized leak of classified information. Obama is
seeking re-election on November 6 in part on the strength of his foreign policy
achievements.Reuters reported on May 29 that the United Nations agency charged
with helping member nations secure their national infrastructures plans to
issue a sharp warning about the risk of the Flame computer virus that was
recently discovered in Iran and other parts of the Middle East.Stuxnet is one
of many weapons in the U.S. cyber-arsenal, which some experts say also includes
a data-gathering tool known as Duqu that was deployed to cull information about
Iran's weapons programs.Iranian officials have described the cyber-attacks as
part of a "terrorist" campaign backed by Israel and the United
States.Some current and former U.S. officials, who asked not to be named,
criticized the Obama administration for talking too freely to the media about
classified operations.Representative Peter King, the Republican chairman of the House of
Representatives Committee on Homeland Security, said, "I believe that no
one, including the White House, should be discussing cyber-attacks.""The
U.S. will now be blamed for any sophisticated,
malicious software, even if it was the Chinese or just criminals," added
Jason Healey, who has worked on cyber-security for the Air Force, White House
and Goldman Sachs, and is now with the Atlantic Council research group.
Spain PM insists on sticking to austerity measures
Spain will stick to harsh austerity measures until
it emerges from financial crisis, the prime minister said Saturday, promising
that the country would survive the present economic turmoil.Mariano Rajoy
acknowledged that the country is experiencing turbulence, but said "we are
not at the edge of a precipice, we will not sink."The government has
"the will to persevere in this line for as long as is necessary," he
said.Spain, where unemployment stands at a Eurozone high of 24.4 percent, has
imposed spending cuts and tax hikes to escape a crisis many fear could
eventually swallow other countries using the European single currency.Rajoy
said Saturday that he supported the creation of a single European fiscal
authority to uphold the credibility of the euro, and acknowledged that for this
to happen it would be necessary for member states to "surrender more of
their fiscal autonomy."He said that while it was possible Spain could have
lived beyond its means, it was also true that those who are now criticizing
Spain a reference to Germany had also lent it money at very cheap rates.German
Chancellor Angela Merkel has long maintained that austerity is the most
important step toward easing the eurozone debt crisis, however, the leaders of
some of those countries hardest hit faced with anti-austerity demonstrations
that have at times turned violent have also called for steps to be taken to try
and boost employment.Newly elected French president Francois Hollande has also
warned against too much of the belt-tightening that Merkel advocates for fear
it could unleash political chaos.Demonstrations against austerity measures in
Greece frequently turn violent, and Spanish police baton-charged striking coal
miners marching in Madrid on Thursday after a group started throwing stones and
bottles. Police said two people were arrested and nine were slightly
hurt.Despite months of painful austerity reforms by Rajoy's conservative
government, there is growing concern that its leaders have not done enough and
Spanish banks may need to be saved from loans gone bad and foreclosures of
property now worth far less than the loans paid out for it.The country's
banking sector is laden with soured investments on real estate
and the government recently needed (EURO)19 billion ($23.4 billion) to rescue
just one bank, Bankia SA.Some estimates have put a complete Spanish banking
sector bailout cost at between (EURO)50 billion and (EURO)150 billion, but
Spain only has (EURO)5 billion left in the (EURO)19 billion bailout fund it
established in 2009.Spain's banking sector, however, is not the sole issue. The
economy is mired in its second recession in three years and is forecast to
contract 1.7 percent for the year.This means the country has to raise money in
bond markets and the interest rate on Spanish 10-year bonds finished trading
Friday at 6.47 percent, as reported by financial data provider FactSet.A rate
of 7 percent is considered unsustainable in the long run. Countries such as Greece, Portugal and Ireland that have faced such rates have had
to be bailed out.Spain's current banking problems have startling similarities
with Ireland. Both countries witnessed unprecedented
property building and buying sprees enabled by their 1999 entry into the euro.
It was an entry that many
economists say was partly responsible for both countries' present problems by
entering into the single currency with more stable economies their credit-risk
profiles were lowered giving their banks unprecedented access to international
loans at rock-bottom rates.
No comments:
Post a Comment