U.K. Recession Drives More Than 1,000 To Suicide: Study
A painful British economic
recession, rising unemployment and biting austerity measures may have driven
more than 1,000 people in England to commit suicide, according to a scientific
study published on Wednesday.The study, a so-called time-trend analysis which
compared the actual number of suicides with those expected if pre-recession
trends had continued, reflects findings elsewhere in Europe where suicides are
also on the rise."This is a grim reminder after the euphoria of the
Olympics of the challenges we face and those that lie ahead," said David
Stuckler, a sociologist at Cambridge University who co-led the study, published
in the British Medical Journal (BMJ).The analysis found that between 2008 and
2010 there were 846 more suicides among men in England than would have been
expected if previous trends continued, and 155 more among women.Between 2000
and 2010 each annual 10 percent increase in the number of unemployed people was
associated with a 1.4 percent increase in the number of male suicides, the
study found.The analysis used data from the National Clinical and Health Outcomes
Database and the Office of National Statistics.Keith Hawton, a professor at the
Centre for Suicide Research at Oxford University who was not involved in the
study, said its findings were "of considerable interest and certainly
raise concerns", but that they must be interpreted carefully."It is
also important that they are not over-dramatised in a way that might increase
thoughts of suicide in those affected by the recession," he said in an
emailed comment.Stuckler, who worked with researchers from Liverpool University
and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, stressed while this
kind of statistical study could not establish a causal link, the power of the
associations was strong. Its conclusions were strengthened by other indicators
of rising mental health problems, stress and anxiety, he added.He also pointed
out the study showed a small reduction in the number of suicides in 2010 which
coincided with a slight recovery in male employment.A survey of 300 family
doctors published by the Insight Research Group on Tuesday found that 76
percent of those questioned about the effects of the economic crisis said they
thought it was making people unhealthier, leading to more anxiety, abortions
and alcohol abuse.Data this month from the government's Health and Social Care
Information Centre showed the number of prescriptions dispensed in England for
antidepressants rose 9.1 percent in 2010.A study published last July, also by
Stuckler, found that across Europe, suicide rates rose sharply from 2007 to 2009
as the financial crisis drove unemployment up and squeezed incomes.The
countries worst hit by severe economic downturns, such as Greece and Ireland,
saw the most dramatic increases in suicides.In Britain, there's little doubt
times have been getting harder. The economy has shrunk for the last nine months
and now produces 4.5 percent less than before the economic crisis.Many Britons
have had the worst squeeze in living standards for 40 years and the crisis has
hit young people hard, with youth unemployment soaring above 20
percent.Stuckler's BMJ study found that the number of unemployed men rose on
average across Britain by 25.6 percent each year from 2008 to 2010, a rise
associated with a yearly increase in male suicides of 3.6 percent."Much of
men's identity and sense of purpose is tied up with having a job. It brings
income, status, importance..." Stuckler said in a telephone
interview."And there's also a pattern in the UK where men are three
times more likely to commit suicide than women, while women are much more
likely to report being depressed and seek help."Hawton noted that
increases in suicides at times of economic recession had been reported before -
for example in the Great Depression of the 1930s and in the economic downturn
in South-east Asia during the 1990s.The World Health Organisation estimates
that every year, almost a million people die from suicide - a rate of 16 per
100,000, or one every 40 seconds. It also estimates that for every suicide,
there are up to 20 attempted ones.
HSBC gives US staff details for tax probe
Global bank HSBC has handed over
details of current and former employees to the US authorities, it confirmed
today, as part of a tax probe that almost sank rival bank UBS in 2009.As a
result the bank could now face legal action from individuals whose details have
been revealed, lawyers representing them said.In a letter to them seen by
Reuters, the bank said it had passed on documents, in which their names appear,
on the request of US authorities looking to hunt down US citizens with untaxed
money held in Swiss accounts.After passing on a first set of documents earlier
this year, HSBC has sent the new batch to the US Department of Justice and the
Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to reach a settlement over the
investigation.HSBC lawyer Lenz & Staehelin has told lawyers acting for
these employees that the documents included the minutes of executive, board and
audit committee meetings, client visit reports, emails and other correspondence
"We have submitted further information to the US authorities but it
concerns the initial enquiry from December 2011. Client information has clearly
not been submitted," HSBC Private Bank spokesman Medard Schoenmaeckers
said by telephone.Banks including HSBC, Credit Suisse and Julius Baer have
already passed on about 10,000 employee names in an attempt to avoid the fate
of private bank Wegelin, which broke up in January under threat of indictment,
bank employees and lawyers said.Credit Suisse said its cooperation with the US
authorities was also in the interests of the bank and its employees. Baer
declined to comment.Lawyer Douglas Hornung, who has filed a complaint against
HSBC on behalf of its former chief legal counsel, said banks who handed
employee names to US authorities infringed the criminal code and Swiss privacy
laws.HSBC has avoided breaching strict Swiss banking secrecy laws by redacting
from the documents any information that could lead to the identification of
clients, said Lenz & Staehelin in a letter to lawyers acting for current
and former employees of the bank.In 2009 the Swiss authorities reached a deal
for UBS to pay a fine of $780 million to avert criminal charges, and ultimately
agreed to allow the bank to reveal details of around 4,450 clients.Hornung said
banks that hand over employee data to US officials are hoping to reduce the
potentially huge fines they might face if they are found to have helped US
clients avoid tax."HSBC could face a much higher fine than UBS, $1.3 to
1.4 billion would be logical. In cooperating HSBC can expect the fine to be
lowered significantly," said Hornung.The benefit of such a reduction for
cooperating would far outweigh anything the banks would have to pay for
breaching obligations to employees in Switzerland, where the maximum fine is 5
million Swiss francs ($5.15 mln) and there are no punitive damages, Hornung
said.A spokeswoman for the Swiss Attorney General confirmed that a legal
complaint against HSBC had been received and said it was considering whether to
open an investigation.A former HSBC employee, who asked not to be named, told
Reuters he had never dealt with US clients and only realised US officials had
his name during a background check when he was shortlisted for a new banking
job.He was not offered the job."It can be difficult to inform former
employees because as a company we don't keep records of their whereabouts. If
they contact us, then we do inform them," Schoenmaeckers said.But Hornung,
a partner at Geneva-based Hornung Avocats, said allegations of professional
damage might be hard to prove."I have spoken to five or six people in the
same situation, which means there is some chance of demonstrating a direct link
between being on the list and difficulties in finding further employment,"
said Hornung.Bruno Seeman, a lawyer from small but locally renowned Zurich law
firm Anwaltsbuero Landmann who is representing another former HSBC employee,
said those wishing to sue the bank were unlikely to get any help from the
largest law firms."The big five in Switzerland are all employed by the large banks, all the big commercial law firms
with the capacity and know-how to act against big Swiss organisations cannot do
so because it would be a conflict of interest," Seemann said."The
effect is to prevent employees from approaching them because these law firms
can't act against existing clients."
No comments:
Post a Comment