NEWS,21.09.2012

What Business Is Wall Street In? 

 

Wall Street doesn't know what business it is in. Regulators don't know what the business of Wall Street is. Investor/shareholders don't know what business Wall Street is in.The only people who know what business Wall Street is in are the high frequency and automated traders. They know what business Wall Street is in better than everyone else. To traders, whether day traders or high frequency or somewhere in between, Wall Street has nothing to do with creating capital for businesses, its original goal. Wall Street is a platform. It's a platform to be exploited by every technological and intellectual means possible.The best analogy for traders? They are hackers. Just as hackers search for and exploit operating system and application shortcomings, high frequency traders do the same thing. A hacker wants to jump in front of your shopping cart and grab your credit card and then sell it. A high frequency trader wants to jump in front of your trade and then sell that stock to you. A hacker will tell you that they are serving a purpose by identifying the weak links in your system. A trader will tell you they deserve the pennies they are making on the trade or the rebate they are getting from the exchange because they provide liquidity to the market.I recognize that one is illegal, the other is not. That isn't the important issue.The important issue is recognizing that Wall Street is no longer serving the purpose that it was designed to. Wall Street was designed to be a market to which companies provide securities (stocks/bonds), from which they received capital that would help them start/grow/sell businesses. Investors made their money by recognizing value where others did not, or by simply committing to a company and growing with it as a shareholder, receiving dividends or appreciation in their holdings. What percentage of the market is driven by investors these days?I started actively trading stocks in 1992. I traded a lot. Over the years I've written quite a bit about the market. I have always thought I had a good handle on the market. Until recently.Over just the past five years, the market has changed. It is getting increasingly difficult to just invest in companies you believe in. Discussion in the market place is not about the performance of specific companies and their returns. Discussion is about macro issues that impact all stocks. And those macro issues impact automated trading decisions, which impact any and every stock that is part of any and every index or ETF. Combine that with the leverage of derivatives tracking companies, indexes and other packages or the leveraged ETFs, and individual stocks become pawns in a much bigger game that I feel increasingly less comfortable playing. It is a game fraught with ever increasing risk.So back to the original question. What business is Wall Street in?Its primary business is no longer creating capital for business. Creating capital for business has to be less than one percent of the volume on Wall Street in any given period. (I would be curious if anyone out there knows what percentage of transactions actually return money to a company for any reason). It wouldn't shock me that even in this environment that more money flows from companies to the market in the form of buybacks (which I think are always a mistake), than flows into companies in the form of equity.My two cents is that it is important for this country to push Wall Street back to the business of creating capital for business. Whether it's through a use of taxes on trades (hit every trade on a stock held less than one hour with a 10 cent tax and all these problems go away), or changing the capital gains tax structure so that there is no capital gains tax on any shares of stock (private or public company) held for one year or more, and no tax on dividends paid to shareholders who have held stock in the company for more than five years. However we need to do it, we need to get the smart money on Wall Street back to thinking about ways to use their capital to help start and grow companies. That is what will create jobs. That is where we will find the next big thing that will accelerate the world economy. It won't come from traders trying to hack the financial system for a few pennies per trade.And solutions won't come from bureaucrats trying to prevent the traders from hacking the system. The only certainty when bureaucrats step in is that the law of unintended consequences will smack us all in the head and the trader/hackers will find new ways to exploit the system that makes them big money and even more money for the big institutions that develop products for the other institutions that are desperate to play the game.Regulators have got to start to recognize that traders are not investors and vice versa and treat them differently. Different regulations. Different tax structure. Different oversight. Individual investors and the funds that just invest in stocks and bonds are not going to crash the market. Big traders who are always leveraging up and maximizing the number of trades/hacks theymake will always put the system at risk. We need to recognize that they do not serve much of a purpose other than to add substantial risk to the global economy. That their stated value add of liquidity does not compensate the U.S. and world economy nearly enough for the risk of collapse they introduce into the system.Wall Street as a whole needs to be in the business of creating capital for companies and selling shares to investors who believe they are shareholders. The government needs to create simple and obvious incentives for this business and extract compensation from the traders/hackers for the systemic failure risk they introduce.There will be another flash crash, and probably a crash far worse than the May 2010 flash crash simply because there are too many players looking for the trillion dollar score. They can't all win, yet how many do you think wouldn't risk everything, even what is not theirs, for that remote chance to score big? Put another way, there is zero moral hazard attached to any trade. So why wouldn't traders take the biggest risk possible? There is value to trading automation. It is here to stay. There is absolutely NO VALUE to high frequency trading. None. We need to bring our markets back to their original goals of creating capital for business. It's impossible to guess how many small to medium size companies have been held back from growing and creating jobs and wealth because of lack of access to capital from the stock market. It's not impossible to know that our economy has suffered because Wall Street equity markets are no longer a source of equity for helping companies grow, it is not a platform for hackers and that needs to change. Quickly.

Iran parades military, warns Israel

Iran warned Israel and the United States against any aggression, as it proudly paraded its troops and military hardware on Friday under the gaze of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and top brass.The Tehran parade, involving thousands of military personnel, dozens of tanks and missiles borne on trucks, marked the anniversary of the start of the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war.Ahmadinejad, in a speech broadcast on state television, said that Iran was using "the same spirit and belief in itself" shown in that war to "stand and defend its rights" today against pressure from world powers.Top Iranian generals said the show of military might should be digested by Israel, which in recent weeks has ramped up threats that it could hit Iranian nuclear facilities."We do not feel threatened by the nonsense uttered by that regime's leaders," the chief of Iran's armed forces, General Hassan Firouzabadi, told the Fars news agency, adding that Iran's response to any attack would be "immediate and unstoppable".General Ataollah Selehi, the commander of Iran's army, told the ISNA news agency that "us holding a military parade is for deterrence and not a threat".US Navy war games He and other military leaders renewed their pledge that Israel would be annihilated if attacked.The head of the Revolutionary Guards' aerospace division in charge of missile defence, Brigadier General Amir Ali Hahjizadeh, repeated Iran's promise to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz if the Islamic republic were attacked or Western sanctions halted its crude exports."If one day the Strait of Hormuz has no benefit for us, then we will deprive others from benefiting from it," he said.However he added that "under current conditions, there is no problem".Hahjizadeh also dismissed navy war games currently being held by the United States and 30 other nations in the Gulf as "no threat to us".Iran is locked in a showdown with the UN Security Council over its controversial nuclear programme.Ahmadinejad on anti-Islam filmThe West, led by the United States, has tightened the vice on Iran by implementing crippling economic sanctions, while Israel - the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear weapons state - has underlined its threats of possible air strikes on Iranian atomic facilities, with or without US help.In his speech, Ahmadinejad also touched on an anti-Islam film made in America by an extremist Christian group that has fuelled violent protests in parts of the Muslim world.He said US government claims it could do nothing to censor the film was a "deception" exploiting the pretext of freedom of expression.He called the film an Israeli-hatched plot "to divide [Muslims] and spark sectarian conflict".Ahmadinejad implicitly referred to his often expressed opinion that the Holocaust never happened to lambast the West for perceived selective censorship."They stand against a question about a historical incident... they threaten and put pressure on nations for posing the question while at the same time in regards to the obscenest insults to the human sanctities and prophets... they shout adherence to freedom [of expression]," he said.Ahmadinejad's stance challenging the facts surrounding the killing of six million Jews by the Nazi regime during World War II is shared by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is the country's commander-in-chief.Early this week, Khamenei told naval cadets: "In some Western countries, no one dares to question the unknown incident of the Holocaust or for that matter some of the morally obscene policies like homosexuality... but insulting Islam and its sanctities under the pretext of freedom of expression is allowed."

 

 

 

NEWS,14.07.2012

JPMorgan Traders May Have Hidden Losses, Could Face Criminal Charges

 

JPMorgan Chase & Co said its traders may have deliberately hidden losses that have since climbed to $5.8 billion for the year, in a development that may result in criminal charges against traders at the bank.The losses came from bets on corporate debt now known as the "London Whale" trades made at JPMorgan's Chief Investment Office. Chief Executive Jamie Dimon said that in the worst-case scenario the derivatives trades would lose another $1.7 billion, and that the bank has fixed the CIO problems.Investors cheered the bank for capping losses and taking steps to ensure it avoids similar bad bets in the future. JPMorgan's shares rose nearly 6 percent on Friday.Even with the trading losses, JPMorgan earned nearly $5 billion overall in the second quarter, thanks to its strong performance in areas such as mortgage lending.The trading losses may be mostly over, but with the disclosure that traders may have lied about their losses, regulatory and legal consequences will linger for some time. Blame for the problems at the CIO office may go further up the management chain to some of the most senior executives at the firm, lawyers said.A source said that federal criminal investigators are looking at people at JPMorgan in London, where the CIO's risky bets were placed. The criminal investigation began in earnest in the past few weeks after JP Morgan's internal investigation uncovered that CIO traders may have intentionally masked losses, the source said."I see little doubt that someone is going to get charged with fraud," said Bill Singer, a lawyer at Herskovits in New York who provides legal counsel to securities industry firms, and publishes the BrokeandBroker website.Authorities ranging from the FBI to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission are probing the bank. The SEC could charge JPMorgan with weaknesses in oversight and internal controls, said James Cox, a securities law expert at Duke University."I think the SEC will continue to look at 'What exactly did Jamie Dimon know and when did he know it?'" Cox said.An internal review found that some of the CIO traders appear to have deliberately ignored the massive size of their trades - and the difficulty in liquidating them - when valuing their positions. The result was not reporting the full declines in the value of positions, which is forcing JPMorgan to restate its first-quarter results. The bank is cooperating with authorities.The trading losses and possible deception from traders are a black eye for Dimon, who was respected for keeping his bank consistently profitable during the financial crisis. Dimon, who has criticized regulators for meddling too much with banks, has lost credibility because of difficulties in his own house."How do we know there are not more roaches in the kitchen?" said Paul Miller, an analyst at FBR Capital Markets, referring to the maxim that seeing a single roach typically means there are far more hiding in the woodwork.The Chief Investment Office became infamous in May when JPMorgan said bad derivatives bets had triggered about $2 billion of paper losses, a figure that turned into $4.4 billion of actual losses in the second quarter.One trader in the CIO, Bruno Iksil, took big enough positions in the credit derivatives markets to earn the nickname "The London Whale." He made at least some of the big bets that caused trouble for the bank, and has since left JPMorgan, a source said on Friday.Ina Drew, who headed the CIO, has also left, and offered to give back as much of her pay as the bank was contractually entitled take back, said Dimon, whose pay could be taken back as well. A spokesman for the bank said JPMorgan had accepted Drew's offer.The bank said it had moved the bad trades from the CIO, which invests some of the company's excess funds, to its investment bank. JPMorgan was one of the inventors of credit derivatives, and its investment bank is one of the biggest traders of the product on Wall Street.The CIO will now focus on conservative investments, JPMorgan said. The bank has taken a number of other steps to prevent these types of losses from repeating, including changing the way it limits risk taking in the CIO's office."People feel good that the loss is largely contained at this point," said Nancy Bush, a banking analyst at independent research firm NAB Research.JPMorgan said later on Friday that its former CIO risk officer, Irvin Goldman, had resigned. Goldman "behaved with integrity and we wish him well," JPMorgan said.JPMorgan's shares rose $2.03 to close at $36.07 on the New York Stock Exchange.THE TEMPEST LEAVES THE TEAPOT The bank posted second-quarter net income of $4.96 billion, or $1.21 a share, compared with $5.43 billion, or $1.27 a share, a year earlier.The derivative loss after taxes reduced earnings per share by 69 cents, the company said.JPMorgan said it expected to file new, restated first-quarter results in the coming weeks, reflecting a $459 million reduction of income because of bad valuations on some of its trading positions. The bank found material problems with its financial controls during the period.The bank said its internal investigation combed through over a million emails, tens of thousands of taped conversations, and other evidence. It learned that some traders may have intended not to value their trading positions at the proper levels.In particular, the traders recorded the value of their trades at current market prices, rather than prices they would get if they liquidated their large positions, in an effort to avoid reporting their full paper losses.The bank made trades that were intended to protect it against the credit markets tanking, but allowed those positions to morph into bets on credit markets getting better.Friday's financial report came three months to the day after Dimon, 56, told stock analysts that news reports about Iksil and looming losses in London were a "tempest in a teapot."That remark, which Dimon told Congress last month was "dead wrong," added to the damage the loss has done to his reputation and his argument that his bank is not too big to be managed safely.A host of international regulators and agencies are probing the trading mishap. Besides the FBI and the SEC, they the UK's Financial Services Authority, the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the U.S. Treasury's Office for the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Libor Scandal May Hit U.S. Banks Harder Than Their British Counterparts

 

Barclays Plc and other UK banks may escape lighter than their U.S. rivals if shareholders seek damages in the wake of an interest rate-rigging scandal, because such cases are costlier and harder to win in Britain.Cases pursued in America by investors alleging they suffered a loss because of the wrongdoing of a financial institution, will often be deemed ineligible to be heard in U.S. courts when the bank in question is foreign, legal experts said.But if investors opt to take their cases to UK courts, they will find Britain's legal structures make such claims harder to win, costlier and riskier."Would we like to sue Barclays in the New York courts weknow well and we're very good at prosecuting in? Sure. But we're not going to because this is a UK situation," said Dominic Auld, a litigation expert at U.S. law firm Labaton Sucharow.Since Barclays admitted its role in manipulating the London interbank offered rate (Libor), lawyers on both sides of the Atlantic are taking calls from investors."I did take a call this morning from an institutional investor who is interested in looking at litigation both from a UK perspective and the U.S ... I expect there will be a good deal of similar interest," said Owen Watkins, a barrister in the corporate department of London law firm Lewis Silkin.More than a dozen banks are being investigated for their roles in setting Libor, including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Deutsche Bank, HSBC Holdings Plc , UBS and Royal Bank of Scotland..Morgan Stanley analysts have calculated the litigation risk to each of the 16 banks involved in setting Libor, an estimate of the rate at which banks could lend to each other and a benchmark for setting many other types of loans, at between $60 million to $1.1 billion. But lawyers say that while it was once commonplace for European investors to issue proceedings in the States, this transatlantic "legal tourism" was brought to an effective end in 2010 by a Supreme Court ruling in the United States.In a case brought against National Australia Bank, the court ruled U.S. securities laws do not have jurisdiction over so-called "F cubed" cases involving foreign investors and a foreign company traded on a non-U.S. market In the case of Barclays, only about 4 percent of its market capitalisation is traded in the U.S. in the form of American Depository Receipts. Any pursuit of meaningful damages from investment losses related to falls in Barclays' share price caused by the scandal will have to be carried out in Britain."Bringing proceedings here is not easy because there are various questions about causation. But most importantly Barclays would fight hard and you take a substantial risk in relation to costs that you would have to pay if you lost," said David Greene, senior partner at London-based law firm Edwin Coe.Furthermore, proceedings by institutional investors are rare and run against the traditions of the City of London financial district which had in part prompted disgruntled investors to make claims in the United States until it was halted by the F-cubed ruling."I don't think that sort of thing would be held in a UK court. I think they would just say the nature of the capital markets is shares go down as well as up. It's the guiding principle here," said one institutional investor who declined to be named because he is a major Barclays shareholder.

NEWS, 12.06.2012.

France keen for budgetary union in Europe

 

France said today it would support taking steps towards budgetary integration in Europe, as Berlin wants, but the first priority must be to agree urgent measures to solve the euro zone's debt crisis.Following talks in Paris with his German counterpart Michael Link, France's European Affairs Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said the issues could be worked on in parallel but a fiscal union could not be built until the current crisis has been brought under control.His comments were the latest sign EU leaders are aiming for an ambitious compromise at a June 28-29 summit where France and southern euro zone countries would get an agreement from Berlin to a growth pact and a path towards a banking union and euro bonds in return for a commitment to work towards fiscal union.Separately, a presidential source said President Francois Hollande will outline France's position in a written submission to the European Council in the days ahead."We very much wish to continue the political discussion on the process of greater economic and monetary integration and we believe, like our German friends, in the building of a political Europe," Cazeneuve told reporters, flanked by Link."At the same time, what comes out of integration measures cannot constitute the response to the urgency of the crisis we face," he added. "We continue to say that given the scale of the crisis we need urgent solutions for growth."Hollande, France's first Socialist president in 17 years and little known internationally before he won the May 6 election, has come to power as political woes in Greece and Spain's banking crisis have thrust the euro zone into new turmoil.His challenge to German Chancellor Angela Merkel's insistence on austerity-only policies looks set to result in EU leaders agreeing on a pro-growth pact to accompany a budget discipline pact agreed earlier this year.But calls by Paris and Madrid for a banking union giving a cross-border agency supervisory powers over European lenders and for steps towards mutualised debt have prompted Merkel to demand agreement in return on an eventual fiscal union that would give Brussels more power over budgets.Compromises Hollande is more open to the idea of ceding sovereignty to EU institutions to safeguard the euro than was his conservative predecessor Nicolas Sarkozy, but faces a struggle selling the idea to a public that is angry over economic gloom it increasingly sees as resulting from monetary union.Hollande is on track to win a solid Socialist bloc majority in a parliamentary election runoff on Sunday that should make it easier for him to cut a deal with Berlin, as he would not need the support of eurosceptic hard-left lawmakers.A top European Central Bank policymaker, Joerg Asmussen of Germany, said he expected relations between France and Germany, the EU's biggest powers, would settle down after the election."I am relatively relaxed (about relations)... I am very certain that after that (the election runoff) the German-French engine will function, which is a necessary precondition to get progress in Europe," he told a business gathering in Berlin.The French presidential source said Paris's preparatory text for the June 28-29 treaty would seek to find "positive talking points and areas of agreement". Cazeneuve said the days ahead would be about compromise."We want to find a way for the European Union to overcome this crisis and for that you need compromises," Cazeneuve said."There will be no political integration if we do not suceed in overcoming the financial and economic crisis and we will not manage to overcome the crisis if we do no not have a supplementary process of integration."Earlier on Tuesday, French Finance Minister Pierre Moscovici said an aid package of up to 100 billion euros for Spain's banks was the first step towards a banking union in the euro zone."What we did for Spain was a convincing step forward but we must go further still," he told Europe 1 radio. "It is the moment where Europeans must define the framework for definitively consolidating the euro in political, budgetary and social terms."Germany believes that a banking union - comprising a common financial regulator and a single deposit guarantee and capitalisation fund for banks - could only work if anchored in a fiscal union with powers to stop members breaking budget rules.Hollande is to meet senior German SPD social democrats in Paris on Wednesday for discussions on Europe as the centre-right Merkel battles to obtain the two-thirds majority support she needs to ratify the EU's fiscal pact and pass a bill on the new European Stability Mechanism, a permanent bailout fund.The SPD leaders will sit down with Merkel earlier on Wednesday as they try to agree a proposal for a financial transaction tax that the SPD wants to make a condition for its support for the upcoming European bills.Even before his election, Hollande had the support of Germany's left for his push for growth instruments like joint project bonds to fund infrastructure projets and an increased lending capacity by the European Investment Bank.

Details emerging of plan B for Greek exit

 

European finance officials have discussed limiting the size of withdrawals from ATM machines, imposing border checks and introducing euro zone capital controls as a worst-case scenario should Athens decide to leave the euro.EU officials have told Reuters the ideas are part of a range of contingency plans.They emphasised that the discussions were merely about being prepared for any eventuality rather than planning for something they expect to happen - no one Reuters has spoken to expects Greece to leave the single currency area.But with increased political uncertainty in Greece following the inconclusive election on May 6 and ahead of a second election on June 17, there is now an increased need to have contingencies in place, the EU sources said.The discussions have taken place in conference calls over the past six weeks, as concerns have grown that a radical-left coalition, SYRIZA, may win the second election, increasing the risk that Greece could renege on its EU/IMF bailout and therefore move closer to abandoning the currency.No decisions have been taken on the calls, but members of the Eurogroup Working Group, which consists of euro zone deputy finance ministers and heads of treasury departments, have discussed the options in some detail, the sources said. Belgium’s finance minister, Steve Vanackere, said at the end of May that it was a function of each euro zone state to be prepared for problems.These discussions have been in that vein, with the specific aim of limiting a bank run or capital flight.As well as limiting cash withdrawals and imposing capital controls, they have discussed the possibility of suspending the Schengen agreement, which allows for visa-free travel among 26 countries, including most of the European Union."Contingency planning is underway for a scenario under which Greece leaves," one of the sources, who has been involved in the conference calls, said."Limited cash withdrawals from ATMs and limited movement of capital have been considered and analysed."Another source confirmed the discussions, including that the suspension of Schengen was among the options raised."These are not political discussions, these are discussions among finance experts who need to be prepared for any eventuality," the second source said."It is sensible planning, that is all, planning for the worst-case scenario."The first official said it was still being examined whether there was a legal basis for such extreme measures."The Bank of Greece is not aware of any such plans," a central bank spokesman in Athens told Reuters when asked about the sources' comments.The vast majority of Greeks - some surveys have indicated 75 to 80%- like the euro and want to retain the currency, something Greek politicians are aware of and which may dissuade them from pushing the country too close to the brink.However, SYRIZA is expected to win or come a strong second on June 17.Leader plans to tear up bailout Alexis Tsipras, the party's 37-year-old leader, has said he plans to tear up or heavily renegotiate the 130-billion-euro bailout agreed with the European Union and International Monetary Fund.The EU and IMF have said they are not prepared to renegotiate.If those differences cannot be resolved, the threat of the country leaving or being forced out of the euro will remain, and hence the need for contingencies to be in place.Switzerland said last month it was considering introducing capital controls if the euro falls apart.In a conference call on May 21, the Eurogroup Working Group told euro zone member states that they should each have a plan in place if Greece were to leave the currency.Belgium's Vanackere said two days after that call that it was a basic function of each euro zone member state to be prepared for any eventuality."All the contingency plans (for Greece) come back to the same thing: to be responsible as a government is to foresee even what you hope to avoid," he told reporters."We must insist on efforts to avoid an exit scenario but that doesn't mean we are not preparing for eventualities."

NEWS, 31.05.2012.

 Spain debt woes spur flight from risk

 

Asian shares and commodities slid while the euro fell to its lowest in almost two years against the dollar on Thursday, as surging borrowing costs in troubled Spain raised fears that it could fail to rescue its banks and may need to seek a bailout. Investors fled from risk assets to US government bonds, with the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield falling below 1.6% in early Asian trade on Thursday, its lowest in at least 60 years. The 10-year Japanese government bond yield  hit a nine-year low of 0.810%. The dollar and the yen were also beneficiaries of escalating risk aversion although gold, a traditional safe-haven asset, struggled in the face of the greenback’s strength.     MSCI’s broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan tumbled as much as 1.6%, and was set for its worst month in eight months with a drop of nearly 12%. The pan-Asia index was down 0.3% for the year.   The index was dragged down as some key Asian bourses - Hong Kong, Australia and Korea - temporarily fell to negative territory for t h e year. Japan’s Nikkei was down 1.4% on the day and  on track for its biggest monthly drop in two years. European shares were likely to tread lower, with spreadbetters predicting major European markets    would open down as much as 0.2%. US stock futures were nearly unchanged.   "The situation in Spain at the moment is untenable, not only is there concern over the state of its banking sector but there is little confidence its government will actually be able to bail them out,” said Michael Creed, an economist at the National Australia Bank. A caution by Spain’s central banker that Madrid will miss deficit targets for this year pushed Spanish 10-year yields  above 6.7%, close to 7%, a level seen as unsustainable and which could push Spain to seek a bailout just as Greece, Portugal and Ireland have done. The cost of insuring against a Spanish default scaled a record high near 600 basis points while Italy, which is also struggling with huge public debt, saw its 10-year yield  top 6% for the first time since January. Yields on all German bond maturities hit record lows on Wednesday, pushing the premium investors demand to hold Spanish debt over German debt to its highest since the launch of the euro at around 543 basis points. Firm dollar slams commodities Oil prices extended losses and copper hit 2012 lows near $7 422 a tonne on Thursday. US crude futures eased 0.3% at $87.59 a barrel and were set for their worst month since late 2008. Brent crude fell 0.3% at $103.15 a barrel, on track for its worst month in two years.     “Investors were already exposed to the problems in Spain, but what really disturbed the market were oil prices and US bond yields which broke out of range to hit long-period lows,” said Lee Seung-wook, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities. The dollar index, measured against a basket of major currencies, extended its rally to 83.11, its highest since September 2010.   The strong dollar and intensifying risk aversion sent the Thomson Reuters-Jefferies CRB index, a global benchmark for commodities, tumbling 1.7% to its lowest levels since September 2010 on Wednesday. A stronger dollar typically weighs on dollar-based commodities. The dollar index was on the verge of closing above its 100-month moving average at 81.82, which would generate a buy signal which in turn could spur a sustained period of dollar strength for the next couple of years to as high as 101.00-106.00, some analysts said. The index has in the past 30 years generated four successful buy signals which have resulted in significant dollar moves, they added.Euro under fire     The euro fell to a 23-month low of $1.2358 and a four-and-a-half month low against the safe-haven yen at ¥97.36. “There is no exit in sight currently for the euro to get out of this downtrend because there is no shortage of negative news,” said Hisamitsu Hara, chief FX manager at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ. “Problems in Spain, a large eurozone economy, heighten fears while the risk of Greece leaving the euro bloc raises contagion concerns. The euro remains depressed, with players  cautiously testing the downside”. Hara added that the euro could weaken until support at the$1.19 level. The euro last dipped below $1.19 in June 2010. The yen rose to a three-and-a-half month high against the dollar at ¥78.71. Hara said wariness over Japanese authorities intervening to prop up the dollar was likely to prevent the US currency from falling sharply further.The European Commission threw Spain two potential lifelines, offering more time to reduce its budget deficit and offering direct aid from a eurozone rescue fund to recapitalise distressed banks. But any relief from the news was quickly offset by the latest Greece polls showing parties for and against a bailout neck-and-neck or very close to each another, ahead of a June 17 election that may decide whether Greece remains in the euro. Asian credit markets weakened, with the spread on the iTraxx Asia ex-Japan investment-grade index widening by 8 basis points.  

Oil prices extend losses

 

 Oil extended losses in Asian trade on Thursday, with prices hitting multi-month lows as Spain's banking woes intensified worries about the eurozone, analysts said.New York's main contract, West Texas Intermediate crude for delivery in July was down nine cents to $87.73 per barrel while Brent North Sea crude for July shed 29c to $103.18 in the afternoon.Prices had slumped Wednesday as the dollar rose to two-year highs against the European single currency, making dollar-priced oil more expensive and hurting demand.WTI crude had plunged $2.94 on Wednesday to its lowest level since October, while Brent declined $3.21, its lowest close since December 16."Right now, the market is wide open. There is still scope for more downside pressure on prices if the bearish sentiment about the eurozone's future keeps up," said Nick Trevethan, senior commodities strategist at ANZ Research.Spain's economic woes were sharply in focus as its 10-year borrowing rates approached the 7% mark considered too high for governments to be able to service their debts.Economists fear Madrid will have to seek an international bailout - following Greece, Ireland and Portugal - despite assurances from Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy.The European Commission weighed in on Wednesday, placing the debt-wracked country at the head of a critical list of 12 economies ordered to carry out sweeping reforms this year to try to stabilise the eurozone debt crisis."Concerns about a possible Greek exit and the risks of contagion from the periphery remain and in the absence of a policy response, oil prices are likely to remain under pressure," said Barclays Capital in a commentary.

NEWS,28.02.2012.

Pirate risk for Costa Cruises liner

A crippled cruise ship owned by the company whose giant liner was wrecked off Italy last month is being towed by a French tuna boat to the main island in the Seychelles, its owners say.An engine room fire on the Costa Allegra knocked out the ship's main power supply in the Indian Ocean on Monday, leaving it adrift with more than a thousand people on board in waters vulnerable to pirates.It is being protected by nine members of an anti-piracy unit of the Italian navy, a precaution regularly taken on ships in the Indian Ocean which is prone to attacks by Somali pirates."The ship is not in a high-risk area, but we can't be 100% sure," said Costa Cruises' Giorgio Moretti.While yachts have been seized in the past near Seychelles, pirates have yet to successfully hijack a cruise liner in the Indian Ocean.The ship's Italian owner, Costa Cruises, a unit of US cruise line giant Carnival Corp, said a plan to tow it to the nearer island of Desroches had been aborted because it would have been harder to moor and disembark the passengers there.The Trevignon, a deep sea trawler which sails the oceans for tuna from the Atlantic port of Concarneau, is pulling the Costa Allegra, a vessel many times its size, on a 400-metre cable at a speed of only about six knots, the Trevignon's skipper Alain Dervout told his local French newspaper, Ouest-France.He was joined today by two tugs and a coastguard ship, all from Seychelles, the archipelago's government said. A military aircraft was also flying in support of the operation.The cruise ship was due to arrive at the Seychelles capital of Victoria on Wednesday evening or Thursday morning local time, depending on weather conditions, government spokeswoman Srdjana Janosevic said. Clocks in the Seychelles are four hours ahead of GMT."Helicopters will ensure continuous supply of food, comfort items, flashlights in order to mitigate guests' discomfort given the difficult conditions on board," Costa Cruises spokesman Davide Barbano said in a statement.A team from the Italian coastguard is heading to the Seychelles to investigate the accident, but a spokesman for the agency it would be wrong to make analogies to the Costa Concordia disaster on January 13, in which at least 25 people died and over which a criminal investigation has been launched."They are two different situations, totally different conditions, so they are not related accidents," Cosimo Nicastro.Prosecutors in the Italian city of Genoa have opened an investigation into the fire on the Costa Allegra, judicial sources said.Nicastro said there was no question of the passengers being transferred to other vessels."The safest place for the people is on the ship. There is no reason to put them on another ship or a helicopter. They will remain on the Costa Allegra and we will keep monitoring the situation," he said.An evacuation off Desroches Island would have presented the ship owner and local authorities with a tricky and expensive logistical operation.The 636 passengers and 413 crew would have had to use the ship's lifeboats to land on the exclusive coral-fringed island, where Britain's Prince William and his then girlfriend, now wife, Kate Middleton, stayed a few years ago."Logistics and hotels on the island are not sufficient. It would require ... an immediate transfer from Desroches to Mahe," Barbano, the Costa Cruises spokesman, said.